Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs David Pichler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 07:42 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Gueymard Wayenburg vs D. Pichler

 FRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

 AUT
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Wayenburg 1 - 1 Pichler
They have played 4 sets in total, with Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg winning 2 and David Pichler winning 2. The last match between David Pichler and Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg was at the Bratislava 2 Challenger, 28-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with David Pichler getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Wayenburg | 1 | 
| Pichler | 1 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Bratislava 2 Challenger(10-28-25)
(Q1) Cassis Challenger(09-01-24)
S. G. Wayenburg vs D. Pichler H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $80,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 54.90% (157-129) | Career Total W/L | 55.56% (355-284) | 
| 1 | Hard | 0 | 
| 0 | Indoor | 1 | 
| 5 | Titles | 3 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
S. G. Wayenburg vs D. Pichler Match Preview:
- In recent months, David Pichler has a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 46.90% of points compared to Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg's 43.43%.
- Is return ability a key factor in this match? Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg has the edge here, winning 47.32% of points on opponents' second serves, outperforming Pichler's 42.25%.
- When it comes to pressure situations, Gueymard Wayenburg slightly outperforms Pichler with a 52.84% breakpoint save rate against Pichler's 50.00%.
- Both players perform best on hard surfaces, with Wayenburg and Pichler each having a career win rate of 59% on their preferred surfaces.
- Over the last year, Wayenburg has a better match win rate at 46.27%, compared to Pichler's 41.67%.
- Wayenburg leads in the head-to-head matchups, having won their only encounter and all sets played against Pichler.
- Evaluating their competition level, Wayenburg has faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 304.1 against Pichler's 429.58.
- In deciding sets, Pichler shows greater resilience, winning 67% of them compared to Wayenburg's 43% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match approaches, it's clear that both players have specific strengths. Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg showcases greater proficiency in return games, particularly on the second serve. This skill may be crucial in breaking David Pichler's service games more effectively.
David Pichler, meanwhile, demonstrates superior second serve performance, which could provide a steady base for his game. Despite this, his breakpoint saving capability slightly lags behind Wayenburg's, which might put him at a disadvantage in crucial moments.
Wayenburg also holds a psychological edge, having won in their previous encounter. Coupled with his experience against higher-caliber opponents, he might handle match pressure better.
Considering all factors, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg appears to be the likely victor in this upcoming match due to his consistent performance and competitive advantage in return games.
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs David Pichler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. G. Wayenburg vs D. Pichler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 21 | Games Won | 20 | 
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 7 | 
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 6 | 
| 1:23:2 | Average Match Time | 1:23:2 | 
| 61% (83/136) | 1st Serve % | 64% (88/137) | 
| 72% (60/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (57/88) | 
| 42% (22/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (23/49) | 
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (5/16) | 
| 42% (57/137) | Return Points Win % | 40% (54/136) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
S. G. Wayenburg Recent Matches Played
D. Pichler Recent Matches Played

S. G. Wayenburg vs D. Pichler Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.90% (157/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.56% (355/284) | 
| 54.71% (366/303) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.44% (815/655) | 
| 52.17% (3323/3047) | Games Win/Loss | 52.48% (7118/6446) | 
| 53.85% (42/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.10% (122/88) | 
| 53.33% (40/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.16% (203/165) | 
| 57.36% (74/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (30/30) | 
| 25.00% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 | 
| 1793 | Aces Total | 1822 | 
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 
| 1301 | Total Double Faults | 1127 | 
| 1:38:58 | Average Match Time | 1:32:33 | 
| 441.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 544.93 | 
| 57% (11465/20204) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22735/37699) | 
| 73% (8325/11465) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (15388/22735) | 
| 48% (4156/8739) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7541/14963) | 
| 43% (887/2087) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1836/4044) | 
| 41% (8329/20544) | Return Points Win % | 41% (15898/38393) | 
| 28.57% (2/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 41.86% (36/50) | Challenger W/L | 40.40% (40/59) | 
| 63.10% (118/69) | Futures W/L | 58.44% (315/224) | 
| 55% (156/285) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (344/623) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) | 
| 48% (44/92) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (81/146) | 
| 46% (45/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (87/196) | 
| 84% (164/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (376/313) | 
| 16% (164/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (376/62) | 
| 16% (122/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (263/42) | 












