Scott Griekspoor vs Thiemo De Bakker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Griekspoor vs Bakker analysis and find out who is favored!
Scott Griekspoor vs Thiemo De Bakker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Griekspoor has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bakker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Griekspoor, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bakker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Griekspoor has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bakker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Griekspoor has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bakker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Griekspoor has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 95/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 111/ 84). Bakker has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Griekspoor has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bakker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Griekspoor has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bakker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Griekspoor has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bakker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Griekspoor 0 - 0 Bakker
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Griekspoor VS Bakker H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Scott Griekspoor | Thiemo De Bakker |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Scott Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Evan Furness
Player
Scott Griekspoor
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Scott Griekspoor
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Carlos Gomez-Herrera
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
65 of
83)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
7%
(
1 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
37 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
40 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
125
|
3-6 7-6(8) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R3 |
Louis Wessels
Player
Scott Griekspoor
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Jay Clarke
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Federico Coria
Player
Scott Griekspoor
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Gabriele Bosio
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Illya Marchenko
Player
Scott Griekspoor
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H |
view more