Sean Hess vs Nikshep BALLEKERE Ravikumar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hess vs Ravikumar analysis and find out who is favored!
Sean Hess vs Nikshep BALLEKERE Ravikumar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hess has won 48.53% of points on his second serve, while Ravikumar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hess, in recent form, has won 51.81% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ravikumar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.11% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hess has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ravikumar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hess has won 63.22% of matches played (W/L 55/ 32), with Ravikumar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hess has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 109/ 79), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Ravikumar has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Hess has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.22% of matches (W/L 55/ 32), where as Ravikumar has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hess has played against opponents with an average rank of 99.46 while Ravikumar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hess has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ravikumar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hess has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ravikumar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hess 0 - 0 Ravikumar
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sean Hess | Nikshep BALLEKERE Ravikumar |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (8/5) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 59% (17/12) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (144/122) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.07 | N/A |
Aces Total | 9 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.15 | N/A |
DFs Total | 19 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 34.92 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 57% (204/356) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 64% (131/204) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (74/152) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (23/46) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 43% (160/370) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 62% (8/5) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (8/13) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | N/A |
Sean Hess Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sean Hess
Player
Tobias Franco
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lautaro Midon
Player
Sean Hess
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sean Hess
Player
Ezequiel Simonit
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Sean Hess
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sean Hess
Player
Santiago Russo
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sean Hess
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Nikshep BALLEKERE Ravikumar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Nikshep Ballekere Ravikumar
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 7-5 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Nikshep Ballekere Ravikumar
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 6-7(5) 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Martijn Molenkamp
Player
Nikshep Ballekere Ravikumar
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Adam Jones
Player
Nikshep Ballekere Ravikumar
45%
(
25 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more