Sebastian Gima vs Mate Voros Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gima vs Voros analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Gima vs Mate Voros Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gima has won 50.46% of points on his second serve, while Voros has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gima, in recent form, has won 56.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Voros has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.96% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gima has saved 62.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Voros has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gima has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 56/ 35), with Voros winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Voros has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 26/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.56% of matches (W/L 51/ 28), where as Voros has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gima winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gima winning 2 and Voros winning 1. The last match between Gima and Voros was at the M15 Antalya, 20-04-2021, Q3, Clay with Sebastian Gima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gima and Voros have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gima winning 1 times and Voros 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gima winning 0, and Voros 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gima has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.34 while Voros has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gima has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Voros has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gima has converted 42.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Voros has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gima 1 - 0 Voros
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
465
Rank
436
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (168-117)
Career Total W/L
51% (27-26)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sebastian Gima | Mate Voros |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 19 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 3-6 10-8 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sebastian Gima | Mate Voros |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 58% (31/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (255/216) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.18 | 0 |
DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:40:22 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 194.22 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (910/1511) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (594/910) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (308/601) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (84/189) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (691/1571) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Dario Drebenstedt
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
42%
(
15 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Sebastian Gima
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Sebastian Gima
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marco Miceli
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jan Hrazdil
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Daniele Minighini
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Mate Voros Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 3-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Peter Goldsteiner
Player
Mate Voros
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more