Sebastian Gima vs Sean Hodkin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gima vs Hodkin analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Gima vs Sean Hodkin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gima has won 48.47% of points on his second serve, while Hodkin has won 47.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gima, in recent form, has won 54.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hodkin has won 49.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.39% and 31.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gima has saved 61.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hodkin has saved 62.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gima has won 62.77% of matches played (W/L 59/ 35), with Hodkin winning 57.14% (W/L 28/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Hodkin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 92/ 69), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 55/ 30), where as Hodkin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 28/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gima winning 2 and Hodkin winning 0. The last match between Gima and Hodkin was at the M15 Heraklion, 15-11-2020, Q1 round, Hard with Sebastian Gima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gima and Hodkin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gima winning 0 times and Hodkin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gima winning 0, and Hodkin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gima has played against opponents with an average rank of 176.23 while Hodkin has played against players with an average rank of 141.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gima has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hodkin has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gima has converted 42.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hodkin has converted 56.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gima 1 - 0 Hodkin
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
454
Rank
436
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (166-115)
Career Total W/L
55% (162-134)
63% (12-7)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sebastian Gima | Sean Hodkin |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sebastian Gima | Sean Hodkin |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (12/7) | 60% (3/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (26/17) | 55% (6/5) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (217/179) | 53% (64/57) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.86 |
Aces Total | 12 | 51 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.08 |
DFs Total | 36 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:28 | 1:37:48 |
Avg Opp Rank | 199.32 | 175.6 |
1st Serve % | 61% (771/1262) | 69% (232/334) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (505/771) | 73% (170/232) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (248/491) | 49% (50/102) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (72/166) | 69% (11/16) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (600/1349) | 37% (117/316) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 63% (12/7) | 60% (3/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (12/19) | 60% (3/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 100% (3/3) |
1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (3/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marco Miceli
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jan Hrazdil
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Daniele Minighini
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Stijn Slump
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jay Clarke
Player
Sebastian Gima
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Gima
Player
Noah Perfetti
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Sean Hodkin Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marcus Walters
Player
Sean Hodkin
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sean Hodkin
Player
David Quayle
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
13
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sean Hodkin
Player
Ying Hou
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Cox
Player
Sean Hodkin
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
1
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sean Hodkin
Player
Finn Bass
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
15
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-7(4) 11-9 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex Knaff
Player
Sean Hodkin
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sean Hodkin
Player
Neil Oberleitner
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sean Hodkin
Player
Alexandros Skorilas
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
7
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more