Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sem Verbeek vs Matthew Christopher Romios Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Verbeek vs Romios analysis and find out who is favored!
Sem Verbeek vs Matthew Christopher Romios Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Verbeek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Romios has won 49.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Verbeek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Romios has won 41.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Verbeek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Romios has saved 51.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Verbeek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Romios winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Verbeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 76/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 52/ 74).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Verbeek winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Verbeek winning 3 and Romios winning 2. The last match between Verbeek and Romios was at the Australia F6 (Toowoomba), 02-10-2017, First, Hard with Sem Verbeek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Verbeek and Romios have played a deciding set 1 times, with Verbeek winning 0 times and Romios 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Verbeek winning 0, and Romios 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Verbeek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Romios has played against players with an average rank of 303.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Verbeek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Romios has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Verbeek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Romios has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Verbeek 1 - 1 Romios
884
Rank
531
High
30
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
889
Rank
563
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
57% (104-78)
Career Total W/L
44% (91-114)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sem Verbeek | Matthew Christopher Romios |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 24 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (75/116) | 53% (69/131) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (49/75) | 61% (42/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (22/41) | 47% (29/62) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (60/131) | 39% (45/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Sem Verbeek
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 1-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Sem Verbeek
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sem Verbeek | Matthew Christopher Romios |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 18% (2/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 37% (36/62) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.89 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:16:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 417.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (195/303) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (126/195) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (48/108) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 29% (4/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 28% (83/295) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Sem Verbeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Sem Verbeek
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Sem Verbeek
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Sem Verbeek
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Sem Verbeek
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Sem Verbeek
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Francisco Cabral
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Sem Verbeek
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Christopher Romios Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Thomas Fancutt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Colin Sinclair
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tao Mu
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Verbeek Vs Romios Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
