Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Seong Taek Im vs Seita Watanabe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Im vs Watanabe analysis and find out who is favored!
Seong Taek Im vs Seita Watanabe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Im has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Watanabe has won 44.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Im, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Watanabe has won 52.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Im has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Watanabe has saved 59.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Im has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Watanabe winning 42.5% (W/L 17/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Im has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 13/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Watanabe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 75/ 65), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Im winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Im winning 2 and Watanabe winning 1. The last match between Im and Watanabe was at the M15 Gimcheon, 18-06-2019, Q3, Hard with Seong Taek Im getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Im and Watanabe have played a deciding set 1 times, with Im winning 1 times and Watanabe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Im winning 0, and Watanabe 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Im has played against opponents with an average rank of while Watanabe has played against players with an average rank of 158.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Im has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Watanabe has won 10% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Im has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Watanabe has converted 52.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Im 1 - 0 Watanabe
Ret.
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
50% (13-13)
Career Total W/L
50% (89-89)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Seong Taek Im | Seita Watanabe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:0 | 2:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (46/89) | 60% (49/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (32/46) | 49% (24/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 28% (12/43) | 45% (15/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (7/7) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (43/82) | 51% (45/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(5) 14-12 |
Stats 
Seong Taek Im
Player
Seita Watanabe
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
28%
(
12 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Seong Taek Im | Seita Watanabe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (10/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (109/122) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:34:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 151.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (454/717) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (280/454) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (118/263) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (28/60) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (277/690) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Seong Taek Im Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Seong Taek Im
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Taek Im
Player
Seita Watanabe
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
28%
(
12 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-7(5) 14-12 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seong Taek Im
Player
Young-Hoon Jeong
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seongbin Sim
Player
Seong Taek Im
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seong Taek Im
Player
Hyeon Il Jung
36%
(
16 of
45)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Seong Taek Im
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Taek Im
Player
Hyeong Don Kim
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Seita Watanabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Seita Watanabe
86%
(
73 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Seita Watanabe
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Seita Watanabe
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
112)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
112)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Seita Watanabe
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Seita Watanabe
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
122)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
114
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Ren Nakamura
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Seita Watanabe
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Hanyi Liu
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Im Vs Watanabe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
