Shamael Chaudhry vs Li-Wie Tan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chaudhry vs Tan analysis and find out who is favored!
Shamael Chaudhry vs Li-Wie Tan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chaudhry has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chaudhry, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chaudhry has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chaudhry has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chaudhry has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 25/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 6/ 14). Tan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 29/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chaudhry winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chaudhry winning 2 and Tan winning 0. The last match between Chaudhry and Tan was at the Egypt F23 (Sharm El Sheikh), 16-10-2018, First, Hard with Shamael Chaudhry getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chaudhry and Tan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chaudhry winning 0 times and Tan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chaudhry winning 0, and Tan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chaudhry has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chaudhry has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chaudhry has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chaudhry 1 - 0 Tan
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
52% (31-29)
Career Total W/L
51% (96-91)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Shamael Chaudhry | Li-Wie Tan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (29/48) | 58% (32/55) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (19/29) | 53% (17/32) |
2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 52% (12/23) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Points W% | 47% (26/55) | 35% (17/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Shamael Chaudhry
Player
Li-Wie Tan
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Shamael Chaudhry | Li-Wie Tan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Shamael Chaudhry Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Vlad Victor Cornea
Player
Shamael Chaudhry
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Shamael Chaudhry
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
4 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Li-Wie Tan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Faisal Qamar
Player
Li-Wie Tan
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ray Ho
Player
Li-Wie Tan
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
50%
(
51 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Takashi Saito
Player
Li-Wie Tan
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Li-Wie Tan
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Igor Shrolik
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Igoshin
Player
Li-Wie Tan
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Colin Van Beem
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve %
40%
(
34 of
85)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
42 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Li-Wie Tan
Player
Gleb Blekher
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
3
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Admir Kalender
Player
Li-Wie Tan
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more