Sheng Tang vs Tomas Vaise Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tang vs Vaise analysis and find out who is favored!
Sheng Tang vs Tomas Vaise Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tang has won 38.89% of points on his second serve, while Vaise has won 51.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tang, in recent form, has won 42.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vaise has won 38.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.89% and 32.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tang has saved 48.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vaise has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tang has won 40.74% of matches played (W/L 11/ 16), with Vaise winning 50% (W/L 14/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 63/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9). Vaise has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Tang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14), where as Vaise has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 14/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tang winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tang winning 2 and Vaise winning 1. The last match between Tang and Vaise was at the M15 Monastir, 08-08-2022, Q2 round, Hard with Sheng Tang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tang and Vaise have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tang winning 1 times and Vaise 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tang winning 0, and Vaise 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tang has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.19 while Vaise has played against players with an average rank of 29.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tang has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vaise has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tang has converted 26.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vaise has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tang 1 - 0 Vaise
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (73-52)
Career Total W/L
38% (36-59)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sheng Tang | Tomas Vaise |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 22 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-7(5) 10-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sheng Tang | Tomas Vaise |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sheng Tang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ryota Tanuma
Player
Sheng Tang
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve %
72%
(
18 of
25)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
33
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Sheng Tang
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sheng Tang
Player
Hao Sheng Koay
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Sheng Tang
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
Player
Sheng Tang
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Sheng Tang
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Sheng Tang
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sheng Tang
Player
Congsup Congcar
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sheng Tang
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yuttana Charoenphon
Player
Sheng Tang
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Tomas Vaise Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Diogo Marques
Player
Tomas Vaise
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jeiden Saidizand
Player
Tomas Vaise
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Tomas Vaise
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Vojtech Vlkovsky
Player
Tomas Vaise
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
72)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Tomas Vaise
Player
Breno Rossetto Urvaneja
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more