Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Tristan Lamasine Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mochizuki vs Lamasine analysis and find out who is favored!
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Tristan Lamasine Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mochizuki has won 46.82% of points on his second serve, while Lamasine has won 49.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mochizuki, in recent form, has won 50.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamasine has won 51.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.43% and 33.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mochizuki has saved 52.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamasine has saved 52.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mochizuki has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/ 28), with Lamasine winning 69.05% (W/L 58/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mochizuki has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 52/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 13/ 16). Lamasine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 173/ 152).
- Player level: In the last year, Mochizuki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/ 10), where as Lamasine has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mochizuki winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mochizuki winning 2 and Lamasine winning 0. The last match between Mochizuki and Lamasine was at the Quimper Challenger, 23-01-2022, Q1 round, I.hard with Shintaro Mochizuki getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mochizuki and Lamasine have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mochizuki winning 0 times and Lamasine 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mochizuki winning 0, and Lamasine 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mochizuki has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.56 while Lamasine has played against players with an average rank of 239.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mochizuki has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamasine has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mochizuki has converted 44.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamasine has converted 44.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mochizuki 1 - 0 Lamasine
164
Rank
129
High
20
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
181
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
54% (151-127)
Career Total W/L
55% (420-338)
38% (5-8)
YTD W/L
59% (19-13)
$557,730
Career Prize Money
$160,780
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Shintaro Mochizuki | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:1 | 1:18:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (42/65) | 67% (37/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (28/42) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 28% (5/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (26/55) | 37% (24/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Shintaro Mochizuki | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 59% (19/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (12/18) | 55% (40/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (139/153) | 51% (371/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/9) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 104 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:36 | 1:44:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 216.77 | 217.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (455/935) | 62% (1413/2271) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (318/455) | 70% (985/1413) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (218/480) | 49% (422/858) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (41/95) | 45% (94/209) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (365/915) | 40% (928/2328) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (19/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 58% (18/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 21% (14/3) |
Shintaro Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Benjamin Hassan
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
43%
(
15 of
35)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Stefan Kozlov
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Arthur Weber
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tristan Lamasine
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jiri Vesely
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Antoine Escoffier
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Lucas Poullain
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Filip Krajinovic
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mochizuki Vs Lamasine Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
