Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sho Shimabukuro vs Calvin Hemery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimabukuro vs Hemery analysis and find out who is favored!
Sho Shimabukuro vs Calvin Hemery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimabukuro has won 51.06% of points on his second serve, while Hemery has won 49.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimabukuro, in recent form, has won 53.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hemery has won 46.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.93% and 28.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimabukuro has saved 56.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hemery has saved 58.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimabukuro has won 53.13% of matches played (W/L 34/ 30), with Hemery winning 63.64% (W/L 49/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19). Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 182/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17), where as Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 35/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shimabukuro winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 2 and Hemery winning 1. The last match between Shimabukuro and Hemery was at the M25 Monastir, 26-01-2022, First, Hard with Sho Shimabukuro getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shimabukuro and Hemery have played a deciding set 1 times, with Shimabukuro winning 1 times and Hemery 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shimabukuro winning 0, and Hemery 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimabukuro has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.58 while Hemery has played against players with an average rank of 293.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimabukuro has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hemery has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimabukuro has converted 45.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hemery has converted 37.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shimabukuro 1 - 0 Hemery
173
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
209
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
62% (214-130)
Career Total W/L
59% (360-254)
27% (4-11)
YTD W/L
45% (10-12)
$196,505
Career Prize Money
$181,475
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shimabukuro VS Hemery H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (45/79) | 61% (50/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (32/45) | 78% (39/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (23/34) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (28/82) | 30% (24/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Shimabukuro VS Hemery H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Calvin Hemery
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
4
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (4/11) | 45% (10/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (12/22) | 46% (23/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (152/180) | 49% (242/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 145 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:48 | 1:46:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 345.13 | 328.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (610/1051) | 63% (965/1529) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (414/610) | 72% (694/965) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (220/441) | 50% (284/564) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (32/60) | 37% (45/123) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (325/957) | 36% (552/1536) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 53% (9/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (4/15) | 43% (9/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Mattia Bellucci
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
136)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
28 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
48 of
136)
125
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alexander Ritschard
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
41%
(
54 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
9
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Calvin Hemery
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Calvin Hemery
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimabukuro Vs Hemery Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
