Stefan Bianchet vs Zachary Adam-Gedge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bianchet vs Adam-Gedge analysis and find out who is favored!
Stefan Bianchet vs Zachary Adam-Gedge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bianchet has won 60.71% of points on his second serve, while Adam-Gedge has won 45.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bianchet, in recent form, has won 47.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Adam-Gedge has won 41.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.08% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bianchet has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Adam-Gedge has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bianchet has won 37.5% of matches played (W/L 6/ 10), with Adam-Gedge winning 33.33% (W/L 10/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bianchet has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 7/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Adam-Gedge has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 17/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Bianchet has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 6/ 10), where as Adam-Gedge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 10/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bianchet winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Bianchet winning 4 and Adam-Gedge winning 0. The last match between Bianchet and Adam-Gedge was at the M25 Cairns, 09-10-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Stefan Bianchet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bianchet and Adam-Gedge have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bianchet winning 0 times and Adam-Gedge 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bianchet winning 0, and Adam-Gedge 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bianchet has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Adam-Gedge has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bianchet has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Adam-Gedge has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bianchet has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Adam-Gedge has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bianchet 2 - 0 Adam-Gedge
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
41% (18-26)
Career Total W/L
34% (21-41)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bianchet VS Adam-Gedge H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Stefan Bianchet | Zachary Adam-Gedge |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 25 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Bianchet VS Adam-Gedge H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 | |||||
7-5 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Stefan Bianchet | Zachary Adam-Gedge |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 33% (1/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) | 29% (2/5) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (50/60) | 47% (35/39) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 20% (1/4) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Stefan Bianchet Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Zaharije-Zak Talic
Player
Stefan Bianchet
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
8
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Zachary Adam-Gedge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Carl Emil Overbeck
Player
Zachary Adam-Gedge
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesse Delaney
Player
Zachary Adam-Gedge
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Zachary Adam-Gedge
Player
Jared Thompkins
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
54
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 1-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-7(1) 10-8 | H2H |
view more