Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Steven De Waard vs Thomas Fancutt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Waard vs Fancutt analysis and find out who is favored!
Steven De Waard vs Thomas Fancutt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Waard has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fancutt has won 48.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Waard, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fancutt has won 46.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Waard has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fancutt has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Waard has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fancutt winning 43.24% (W/L 16/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Waard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/ 42). Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Waard winning 3 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Waard winning 6 and Fancutt winning 0. The last match between Waard and Fancutt was at the Canberra Challenger, 28-10-2017, Q1 round, Hard with Steven De Waard getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Waard and Fancutt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Waard winning 0 times and Fancutt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Waard winning 0, and Fancutt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Waard has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fancutt has played against players with an average rank of 185.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Waard has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fancutt has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Waard has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fancutt has converted 45.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Waard 3 - 0 Fancutt
Ret.
Rank
707
High
32
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
3
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
784
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
51% (66-64)
Career Total W/L
53% (228-200)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Steven De Waard | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
| Games Won | 37 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:29 | 0:47:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (75/117) | 65% (82/126) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (56/75) | 65% (53/82) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (26/42) | 50% (22/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (51/126) | 30% (35/117) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Steven De Waard | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (13/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (148/159) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.78 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 118 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:28:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 178.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (527/937) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (385/527) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (203/410) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (32/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (325/926) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Steven De Waard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Steven De Waard
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
93)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Ruben Mccormack
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Steven De Waard
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
6
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
8
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
James Frawley
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Chanchin Sookton-Eng
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Steven De Waard
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Steven De Waard
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven De Waard
Player
Thomas Fancutt
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Waard Vs Fancutt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
