Stijn Pel vs Dharmil Shah Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pel vs Shah analysis and find out who is favored!
Stijn Pel vs Dharmil Shah Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pel has won 50.72% of points on his second serve, while Shah has won 31.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pel, in recent form, has won 45.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shah has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.89% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pel has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shah has saved 35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pel has won 58% of matches played (W/L 29/ 21), with Shah winning 34.78% (W/L 8/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Shah has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 26% (W/L 12/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Pel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58% of matches (W/L 29/ 21), where as Shah has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 34.78% of matches (W/L 8/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pel winning 2 and Shah winning 0. The last match between Pel and Shah was at the M15 Indore, 07-03-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Stijn Pel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pel and Shah have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pel winning 0 times and Shah 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pel winning 0, and Shah 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pel has played against opponents with an average rank of 59.18 while Shah has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pel has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shah has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pel has converted 32.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shah has converted 53.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pel 1 - 0 Shah
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (57-44)
Career Total W/L
28% (16-41)
45% (5-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Stijn Pel | Dharmil Shah |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Stijn Pel | Dharmil Shah |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) | 0% (0/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (108/110) | 28% (19/48) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.54 | 0 |
Aces Total | 58 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
DFs Total | 23 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:32:21 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 215.27 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (456/714) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (318/456) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (132/258) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (23/68) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (244/695) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Stijn Pel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stijn Pel
Player
Liova Ajavon
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stijn Pel
Player
Phoenix Weir
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Antoine Hoang
Player
Stijn Pel
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leonardo Malgaroli
Player
Stijn Pel
49%
(
43 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stijn Pel
Player
Matteo Fondriest
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Stijn Pel
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve %
65%
(
15 of
23)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
27
Total Points Won
13
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Stijn Pel
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Dharmil Shah Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ha Minh Duc Vu
Player
Dharmil Shah
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Congsup Congcar
Player
Dharmil Shah
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dharmil Shah
Player
Ashkan Ghorbanzadeh
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-7(3) 7-5 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Jagmeet Singh
Player
Dharmil Shah
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H |
view more