Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Strong Kirchheimer vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Findel-Hawkins analysis and find out who is favored!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 49.31% of points on his second serve, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 49.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 50% of matches played (W/L 27/ 27), with Findel-Hawkins winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115). Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22), where as Findel-Hawkins has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kirchheimer winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kirchheimer winning 2 and Findel-Hawkins winning 0. The last match between Kirchheimer and Findel-Hawkins was at the M15 Tallahassee, 06-12-2019, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kirchheimer and Findel-Hawkins have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kirchheimer winning 0 times and Findel-Hawkins 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kirchheimer winning 0, and Findel-Hawkins 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 283 while Findel-Hawkins has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 41.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 1 - 0 Findel-Hawkins
475
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
56% (272-210)
Career Total W/L
59% (70-49)
42% (5-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,990
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kirchheimer VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (38/55) | 53% (31/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (33/38) | 71% (22/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (8/17) | 39% (11/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (26/59) | 25% (14/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kirchheimer VS Findel-Hawkins H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (14/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (134/148) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 54 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 508.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (567/920) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (395/567) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (176/353) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (26/68) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (311/878) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kirchheimer Vs Findel-Hawkins Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
