Strong Kirchheimer vs Tyler Zink Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Zink analysis and find out who is favored!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Tyler Zink Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 49.73% of points on his second serve, while Zink has won 44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 49.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zink has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.88% and 31.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 61.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zink has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 50% of matches played (W/L 28/ 28), with Zink winning 28.57% (W/L 4/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115). Zink has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 24/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23), where as Zink has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.98 while Zink has played against players with an average rank of 269.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zink has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 41.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zink has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 0 - 0 Zink
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
458
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
874
Rank
781
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (271-209)
Career Total W/L
44% (33-42)
40% (4-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,990
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kirchheimer VS Zink H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Tyler Zink |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 44% (11/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (110/125) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
Aces Total | 50 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
DFs Total | 34 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:40 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 494.9 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (460/774) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (322/460) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (157/314) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (22/60) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (253/726) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Holt
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Ajeet Rai
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 5-2 | H2H |
view more
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Learner Tien
Player
Tyler Zink
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
William Grant
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alfredo Perez
Player
Tyler Zink
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Szymon Kielan
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more