Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs Jason Murray Kubler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Kubler analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Jason Murray Kubler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.61% of points on his second serve, while Kubler has won 46.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kubler has won 53.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.87% and 30.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 64.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kubler has saved 53.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 55/ 30), with Kubler winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kubler has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 243/ 105), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 44/ 20), where as Kubler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 7/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nagal winning 1 and Kubler winning 2. The last match between Nagal and Kubler was at the Sarasota Challenger, 12-04-2022, First, Clay with Jason Murray Kubler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Kubler have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Kubler 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 0, and Kubler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.86 while Kubler has played against players with an average rank of 182.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kubler has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 47.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kubler has converted 32.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nagal 0 - 1 Kubler
80
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
174
Rank
63
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
61% (317-204)
Career Total W/L
67% (407-204)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$1,200,795
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Jason Murray Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:29:17 | 2:29:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (71/102) | 55% (42/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 49% (35/71) | 62% (26/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (14/31) | 47% (16/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 33% (8/24) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (34/76) | 52% (53/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Sumit Nagal
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
102)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Jason Murray Kubler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 33% (3/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (359/288) | 46% (42/49) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:56 | 2:55:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 214.64 | 48 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1475/2097) | 65% (193/297) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (992/1475) | 63% (122/193) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (347/622) | 46% (48/104) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/193) | 32% (12/37) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (820/2042) | 39% (123/318) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Murray Kubler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
68%
(
137 of
202)
1st Serve %
62%
(
109 of
175)
16
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
90 of
137)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
71 of
109)
43%
(
28 of
65)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
84 of
202)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
71 of
175)
189
Total Points Won
188
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve %
47%
(
14 of
30)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hugo Gaston
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
67%
(
92 of
137)
1st Serve %
55%
(
77 of
140)
30
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
11
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
60 of
77)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
40 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
140)
148
Total Points Won
129
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Ugo Humbert
66%
(
104 of
157)
1st Serve %
57%
(
77 of
135)
10
Aces
24
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
59 of
77)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
62 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
135)
147
Total Points Won
145
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nagal Vs Kubler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
