Sumit Nagal vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 54.07% of points on his second serve, while Fatic has won 47.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 55.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 47.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.01% and 36.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 62.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 60.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 63.41% of matches played (W/L 52/ 30), with Fatic winning 54.93% (W/L 39/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 210/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 278/ 186), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.16% of matches (W/L 45/ 22), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nagal winning 1 and Fatic winning 2. The last match between Nagal and Fatic was at the Zadar Challenger, 26-03-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Fatic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Fatic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 0, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.67 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 262.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 43.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 41.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nagal 0 - 1 Fatic
14
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
97
Rank
97
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
200
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
61% (313-202)
Career Total W/L
58% (338-249)
64% (14-8)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$424,025
Career Prize Money
$70,890
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sumit Nagal | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 15 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 2:26:1 | 2:26:1 |
1st Serve % | 70% (65/93) | 62% (68/110) |
1st Serve Win% | 58% (38/65) | 72% (49/68) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (14/28) | 43% (18/42) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 60% (6/10) |
Return Points W% | 39% (43/110) | 44% (41/93) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-3 7-5 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Sumit Nagal
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
39%
(
43 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sumit Nagal | Nerman Fatic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 64% (14/8) | 45% (5/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (34/17) | 46% (12/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 56% (275/218) | 47% (117/133) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.5 |
Aces Total | 45 | 61 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 30 | 25 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:9 | 1:33:35 |
Avg Opp Rank | 222.18 | 310.73 |
1st Serve % | 71% (1117/1580) | 62% (425/683) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (765/1117) | 72% (304/425) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (254/463) | 48% (125/258) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (70/156) | 31% (17/54) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (660/1613) | 36% (260/730) |
Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 75% (9/3) | 38% (3/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (13/20) | 45% (5/11) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
84%
(
41 of
49)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Sumit Nagal
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Adam Walton
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Nerman Fatic
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
21 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Nerman Fatic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more