Suzan Lamens vs Xinxin Yao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 04:24 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Lamens vs X. Yao

 NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lamens 1 - 0 Yao
They have played 2 sets in total, with Suzan Lamens winning 2 and Xinxin Yao winning 0. The last match between Suzan Lamens and Xinxin Yao was at the Suzhou WTA 125 - Suzhou, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Lamens | 1 | 
| Yao | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Suzhou WTA 125 - Suzhou(10-01-25)
S. Lamens vs X. Yao H2H Profile
S. Lamens vs X. Yao Match Preview:
- Xinxin Yao excels with their second serve, winning 42.39% of points, compared to Suzan Lamens' 38.33%. Could this give Yao an advantage in the serve stats?
 - In return games, Lamens narrowly surpasses Yao on opponent's second serves, with 51.32% to Yao's 50.66%. Does this indicate a slight edge for Lamens?
 - The first-serve return stats show Yao winning 35.84% of points, ahead of Lamens' 31.48%, suggesting an advantage in returning strong serves.
 - While under pressure, Lamens has saved 48.58% of breakpoints, outperforming Yao's 45.23%, which might tip the balance slightly in tight moments.
 - Over the last year, Lamens' win rate stands at 56.52%, significantly higher than Yao's 41.18%. Does this suggest greater overall performance consistency for Lamens?
 - Considering surface preferences, Yao shines on Hard courts with a 65% win rate, while Lamens prefers Clay with the same win percentage.
 - In terms of competition level, Lamens has a higher performance on the Main tour with a 62.16% win rate, compared to Yao's 39.47% in lower-tier events.
 - Evaluating opponent quality, Lamens has faced stronger players (average rank 129.03) compared to Yao's opponents (average rank 345.73).
 - Should the match reach a deciding set, Lamens' success rate at 56% is notably higher than Yao's 24%, suggesting better performance under pressure.
 - When factoring all these statistics, who stands a better chance at victory in the pending match?
 
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match features two players with distinct strengths and weaknesses, setting the stage for an interesting contest.
Xinxin Yao demonstrates reliable second-serve performance and a solid record on Hard courts. Sensible strategies and alignment to their strengths could yield favorable outcomes during the match.
However, Suzan Lamens presents a strong case for victory with a superior win rate against higher-ranked opponents and demonstrated prowess on the main tour. Their ability to save breakpoints and clinch deciding sets further adds to their potential dominance.
Taking into account both players' recent performance metrics and strengths, Suzan Lamens appears more likely to emerge victorious in this match-up.
Suzan Lamens vs Xinxin Yao Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Lamens vs X. Yao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 5 | 
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 | 
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 5 | 
| 1:24:7 | Average Match Time | 1:24:7 | 
| 69% (33/48) | 1st Serve % | 64% (36/56) | 
| 61% (20/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) | 
| 40% (6/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) | 
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) | 
| 61% (34/56) | Return Points Win % | 46% (22/48) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
S. Lamens Recent Matches Played
X. Yao Recent Matches Played

S. Lamens vs X. Yao Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.91% (313/237) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.14% (178/118) | 
| 55.24% (696/564) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.60% (391/265) | 
| 52.59% (6030/5435) | Games Win/Loss | 54.68% (3270/2710) | 
| 52.69% (88/79) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.27% (155/90) | 
| 60.26% (188/124) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.90% (18/23) | 
| 57.14% (32/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (5/5) | 
| 33.33% (5/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 | 
| 887 | Aces Total | 181 | 
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 | 
| 2600 | Total Double Faults | 569 | 
| 1:29:44 | Average Match Time | 1:26:39 | 
| 426.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 439.73 | 
| 59% (19517/33101) | 1st Serve % | 66% (10173/15356) | 
| 62% (12027/19470) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (6070/10173) | 
| 43% (5811/13656) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2366/5183) | 
| 50% (2222/4402) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1097/2166) | 
| 48% (15890/33282) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7654/15725) | 
| 29.41% (5/12) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 38.89% (7/11) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 73.33% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50.75% (34/33) | Main Tour W/L | 28.57% (2/5) | 
| 62.08% (167/102) | Challenger W/L | 52.11% (74/68) | 
| 54.27% (89/75) | Futures W/L | 70.83% (102/42) | 
| 57% (310/546) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (173/288) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50% (51/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (30/57) | 
| 56% (90/162) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (31/71) | 
| 90% (289/261) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (177/159) | 
| 10% (289/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (177/18) | 
| 20% (261/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (119/18) |