Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sven Lah vs Thomas Fancutt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lah vs Fancutt analysis and find out who is favored!
Sven Lah vs Thomas Fancutt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lah has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fancutt has won 48.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lah, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fancutt has won 46.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lah has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fancutt has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lah has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fancutt winning 43.24% (W/L 16/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lah has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8). Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lah winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lah winning 2 and Fancutt winning 0. The last match between Lah and Fancutt was at the M15 Lubbock, 29-09-2021, First, Hard with Sven Lah getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lah and Fancutt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lah winning 0 times and Fancutt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lah winning 1, and Fancutt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lah has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fancutt has played against players with an average rank of 185.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lah has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fancutt has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lah has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fancutt has converted 45.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lah 1 - 0 Fancutt
Ret.
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
784
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
58% (29-21)
Career Total W/L
53% (228-200)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sven Lah | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (49/75) | 45% (29/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (38/49) | 69% (20/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (14/26) | 51% (18/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (26/64) | 31% (23/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Sven Lah
Player
Thomas Fancutt
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sven Lah | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (13/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (148/159) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.78 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 118 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:28:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 178.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (527/937) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (385/527) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (203/410) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (32/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (325/926) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Sven Lah Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Sven Lah
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sven Lah
Player
Justin Butsch
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Sven Lah
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
49 of
61)
8
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sven Lah
Player
Mark Whitehouse
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sven Lah
Player
Tyler Zink
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sven Lah
Player
Thomas Fancutt
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 7-6(5) 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Lah Vs Fancutt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
