Taha Baadi vs Joshua Peck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 09:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Baadi vs J. Peck

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Baadi 1 - 0 Peck
They have played 2 sets in total, with Taha Baadi winning 2 and Joshua Peck winning 0. The last match between Taha Baadi and Joshua Peck was at the M15 Trois-Rivieres, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Taha Baadi getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Baadi | 1 |
| Peck | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Trois-Rivieres(10-30-25)
T. Baadi vs J. Peck H2H Profile
T. Baadi vs J. Peck Match Preview:
- In recent months, Taha Baadi has proven superior in winning second serve points, achieving a 44.89% success rate, compared to Joshua Peck's 36.84%. Could this give Baadi an edge?
- In receiving games, Baadi has a 48.00% win rate on opponents' second serve points, while Peck closely trails with 49.32%.
- For first serve returns, Peck slightly outperforms Baadi, winning 29.92% compared to Baadi's 27.94%.
- Under pressure, both players show resilience. However, Baadi has a marginally better record, saving 49.32% of breakpoints, slightly ahead of Peck's 48.05%.
- Over the past year, Baadi has a slight edge in overall match wins, with a 49.12% success rate compared to Peck's 48.65%.
- Baadi's favored surface is Hard, boasting a 49% career win rate. Conversely, Peck excels on Clay, with a similar 49% success rate.
- Both typically compete in lower-level tournaments, yet Baadi has played against slightly weaker opponents, with an average ranking of 373.89 versus Peck's 300.81.
- In terms of deciding sets, Peck is more successful, winning 64% compared to Baadi's 50%, which might be crucial under tight match conditions.
- Overall, current event performance and adaptability to specific tournaments could sway the match outcome, underscoring the importance of form.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the statistics, both players exhibit comparable strengths with slight differences giving each a potential advantage.
Taha Baadi's second serve performance and breakpoint saves suggest robust playing under pressure. His overall match win rate is slightly higher, marking him as a tenacious competitor.
Joshua Peck's proficiency in deciding sets and his better performance against higher-ranked players indicate resilience and competitive edge in critical situations.
The match could hinge on Peck's ability to leverage his experience with tougher opponents and clutch performance in deciding sets. However, Baadi's consistent service game and tactical advantage in high-pressure situations make him a strong contender.
Given the outlined facts, Taha Baadi slightly edges out as the most likely winner for this upcoming tennis match.
Taha Baadi vs Joshua Peck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Baadi vs J. Peck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:46:12 | Average Match Time | 1:46:12 |
| 71% (44/62) | 1st Serve % | 77% (60/78) |
| 68% (30/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (32/60) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9/18) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 47% (37/78) | Return Points Win % | 35% (22/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Baadi Recent Matches Played
J. Peck Recent Matches Played

T. Baadi vs J. Peck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.94% (92/104) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.99% (63/74) |
| 46.93% (214/242) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.81% (142/168) |
| 48.25% (2066/2216) | Games Win/Loss | 48.70% (1437/1514) |
| 49.04% (51/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.59% (43/42) |
| 34.48% (10/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 50.00% (31/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 23.08% (6/20) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 598 | Aces Total | 302 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 571 | Total Double Faults | 298 |
| 1:27:59 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 441.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 348.99 |
| 61% (7042/11545) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2986/4993) |
| 66% (4676/7042) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2011/2986) |
| 47% (2112/4503) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (892/2007) |
| 41% (450/1103) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (159/428) |
| 39% (4518/11578) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1832/4953) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 30.43% (14/32) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 53.10% (77/68) | Futures W/L | 47.97% (59/64) |
| 47% (91/195) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (61/133) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 46% (24/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (19/42) |
| 51% (33/65) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 76% (101/77) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (62/53) |
| 24% (101/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (62/9) |
| 15% (95/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (75/10) |