Tallon Griekspoor vs Brandon Nakashima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 08:11 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Griekspoor vs B. Nakashima

NED
1
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Griekspoor 1 - 1 Nakashima
They have played 5 sets in total, with Tallon Griekspoor winning 2 and Brandon Nakashima winning 3. The last match between Tallon Griekspoor and Brandon Nakashima was at the Erste Bank Open - Vienna, 22-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Griekspoor | 1 |
| Nakashima | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) Erste Bank Open - Vienna(10-22-25)
(R2) French Open - Paris(05-25-22)
T. Griekspoor vs B. Nakashima H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $4,249,855 | Career Prize Money | $3,667,225 |
| 62.06% (427-261) | Career Total W/L | 60.66% (259-168) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 21 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 57.69% (30-22) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.24% (32-27) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
T. Griekspoor vs B. Nakashima Match Preview:
- Tallon Griekspoor and Brandon Nakashima show similar recent form on second serve points, with Nakashima slightly ahead at 48.53% compared to Griekspoor's 47.51%.
- In terms of return game effectiveness, Griekspoor edges out slightly by securing 44.13% of opponent's second serve points, against Nakashima's 43.12%.
- For first serve returns, Nakashima holds a small lead, winning 23.79% compared to Griekspoor's 22.19%.
- Does Nakashima perform better under pressure? Yes, as he saves 61.09% of breakpoints while Griekspoor saves 59.92%.
- Griekspoor has a higher recent win percentage at 55% while Nakashima follows closely with 53.13%.
- Examining surface preferences, Griekspoor favors grass with a 67% win rate, whereas Nakashima excels on indoor hard courts at the same win rate of 67%.
- Both players have solid results on the Main tour, Griekspoor winning 60% of matches, slightly better than Nakashima's 57.89%.
- It's notable that Nakashima won the only head-to-head meeting, decisively in straight sets.
- Interestingly, Griekspoor has faced tougher opponents on average, with their average ranking being 63.38 compared to Nakashima's 72.28.
- In deciding sets, Griekspoor shows a better performance, winning 60% versus Nakashima's 43%.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
In their upcoming encounter, both Tallon Griekspoor and Brandon Nakashima present competitive profiles. Analysis shows Nakashima slightly ahead in direct head-to-head with a previous victory.
Griekspoor might leverage his success on tougher opponents and strength in deciding sets to gain an advantage. However, Nakashima's efficiency under pressure and remarkable recent performance in second serve points suggest resilience.
Given these insights, Brandon Nakashima is predicted to have a slight edge in this match, likely securing another win. Nevertheless, the clash promises to be tightly contested with potential surprises.
Tallon Griekspoor vs Brandon Nakashima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Griekspoor vs B. Nakashima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 26 | Games Won | 31 |
| 21 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:9:3 | Average Match Time | 2:9:3 |
| 68% (127/188) | 1st Serve % | 63% (116/183) |
| 76% (96/127) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (89/116) |
| 43% (26/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (38/67) |
| 13% (2/16) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (5/14) |
| 31% (56/183) | Return Points Win % | 35% (66/188) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played

T. Griekspoor vs B. Nakashima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.06% (427/261) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.66% (259/168) |
| 58.61% (980/692) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.88% (623/435) |
| 52.55% (8581/7748) | Games Win/Loss | 53.00% (5562/4933) |
| 63.68% (149/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.48% (127/83) |
| 63.51% (181/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (35/35) |
| 54.62% (71/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68.37% (67/31) |
| 66.67% (26/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 61.22% (30/19) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.57 |
| 3679 | Aces Total | 2952 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1762 | Total Double Faults | 711 |
| 1:30:59 | Average Match Time | 1:46:52 |
| 405.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.89 |
| 64% (28887/45472) | 1st Serve % | 64% (20168/31577) |
| 72% (20929/28887) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (15012/20168) |
| 51% (8531/16600) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (6161/11409) |
| 40% (1622/4052) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1022/2721) |
| 37% (16896/45388) | Return Points Win % | 37% (12068/32789) |
| 50.00% (28/28) | Slam W/L | 48.89% (22/23) |
| 44.00% (22/28) | Masters W/L | 47.69% (31/34) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (3/0) |
| 58.39% (87/62) | Main Tour W/L | 59.24% (93/64) |
| 67.05% (118/58) | Challenger W/L | 69.40% (93/41) |
| 68.67% (160/73) | Futures W/L | 73.91% (17/6) |
| 63% (399/635) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (229/377) |
| 49% (19/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (26/46) |
| 57% (171/302) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (135/247) |
| 56% (144/255) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (67/135) |
| 84% (417/350) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (261/223) |
| 16% (417/66) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (261/38) |
| 28% (271/77) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (165/34) |