Tamira Paszek vs Lexie Stevens Important H2H Prediction Stats:

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paszek has won 43.81% of points on his second serve, while Stevens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paszek, in recent form, has won 58.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stevens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.02% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Paszek has saved 55.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stevens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Paszek has won 61.29% of matches played (W/L 38/ 24), with Stevens winning 42.86% (W/L 12/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Paszek has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 56/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 49/ 47). Stevens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
• Player level: In the last year, Paszek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 30/ 21), where as Stevens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paszek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paszek winning 2 and Stevens winning 0. The last match between Paszek and Stevens was at the W80 Poitiers, 24-10-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with Tamira Paszek getting the victory .
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Paszek and Stevens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paszek winning 0 times and Stevens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paszek winning 0, and Stevens 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paszek has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.03 while Stevens has played against players with an average rank of 307.07.
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paszek has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stevens has won 14% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Paszek has converted 51.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stevens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.