Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Taro Daniel vs Emilio Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Daniel vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Taro Daniel vs Emilio Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel has won 52.08% of points on his second serve, while Nava has won 49.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel, in recent form, has won 50.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.94% and 27.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel has saved 60.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 67.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel has won 55.07% of matches played (W/L 38/ 31), with Nava winning 61.04% (W/L 47/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 300/ 193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 62/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/ 14), where as Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Daniel winning 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Daniel winning 6 and Nava winning 4. The last match between Daniel and Nava was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 08-05-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Emilio Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniel and Nava have played a deciding set 2 times, with Daniel winning 0 times and Nava 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Daniel winning 0, and Nava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.87 while Nava has played against players with an average rank of 284.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel has converted 46.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 39.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Daniel 2 - 2 Nava
85
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
2
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
59% (547-388)
Career Total W/L
60% (170-113)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$2,142,314
Career Prize Money
$402,385
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Taro Daniel | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 4 |
| Games Won | 53 | 45 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:13 | 2:1:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (168/273) | 61% (203/331) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (119/168) | 66% (134/203) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (66/105) | 50% (64/128) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (13/31) | 41% (9/22) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (133/331) | 32% (88/273) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Taro Daniel
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Emilio Nava
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 7-5 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Taro Daniel | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (20/26) | 59% (35/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (204/229) | 53% (320/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.71 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 210 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:16 | 1:43:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 175.85 | 289.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (821/1365) | 63% (1237/1949) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (567/821) | 73% (902/1237) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (273/544) | 50% (358/712) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (40/90) | 41% (63/152) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (459/1319) | 36% (652/1834) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 53% (8/7) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 31% (4/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 18% (11/2) |
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Christopher O'Connell
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
37%
(
18 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Taro Daniel
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Taro Daniel
45%
(
43 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Taro Daniel
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Emilio Nava
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Vs Nava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
