Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Taro Daniel vs Michael Redlicki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Daniel vs Redlicki analysis and find out who is favored!
Taro Daniel vs Michael Redlicki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel has won 52.08% of points on his second serve, while Redlicki has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel, in recent form, has won 50.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Redlicki has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.94% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel has saved 60.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Redlicki has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel has won 55.07% of matches played (W/L 38/ 31), with Redlicki winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 300/ 193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Redlicki has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 24/ 17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 65/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/ 14), where as Redlicki has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniel winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniel winning 2 and Redlicki winning 1. The last match between Daniel and Redlicki was at the Aptos Challenger, 08-08-2019, Third, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniel and Redlicki have played a deciding set 1 times, with Daniel winning 1 times and Redlicki 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Daniel winning 1, and Redlicki 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.87 while Redlicki has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Redlicki has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel has converted 46.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Redlicki has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Daniel 1 - 0 Redlicki
85
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
313
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
58% (546-388)
Career Total W/L
56% (109-84)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,142,314
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Taro Daniel | Michael Redlicki |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:18:52 | 2:18:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (58/86) | 64% (64/100) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (47/58) | 67% (43/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (14/28) | 61% (22/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (35/100) | 29% (25/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Michael Redlicki
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Taro Daniel | Michael Redlicki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (20/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (204/229) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 175.85 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (821/1365) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (567/821) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (273/544) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (40/90) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (459/1319) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Christopher O'Connell
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
37%
(
18 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Taro Daniel
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Taro Daniel
45%
(
43 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Taro Daniel
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Redlicki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Michael Redlicki
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Michael Redlicki
68%
(
78 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
115
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
Michael Redlicki
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Donald Young
Player
Michael Redlicki
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
70%
(
80 of
115)
2
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
53 of
80)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(5) 1-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Redlicki
Player
Jc Aragone
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blu Baker
Player
Michael Redlicki
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Redlicki
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Michael Redlicki
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
87%
(
39 of
45)
1
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Redlicki
Player
Blu Baker
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Redlicki
Player
Mathieu Scaglia
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Vs Redlicki Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
