Prediction of Tatiana Panova vs Amanda Coetzer Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Panova vs A. Coetzer

Tatiana Panova
RUS
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
2
Win
6
Played
4
Win
49
Age
54
1.54m
Height
1.58m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
22
Best Rank
12
0
Total Titles
9
0
YTD Titles
0
$51.6K
Career Money
$0
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Amanda Coetzer
RSA
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
6
Played
4
Win
49
Age
54
1.54m
Height
1.58m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
22
Best Rank
12
0
Total Titles
9
0
YTD Titles
0
$51.6K
Career Money
$0
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Panova 2 - 4 Coetzer
They have played 13 sets in total, with Tatiana Panova winning 4 and Amanda Coetzer winning 9. The last match between Tatiana Panova and Amanda Coetzer was at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Filderstadt, 08-10-2001, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Tatiana Panova getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Panova | 2 |
| Coetzer | 4 |
Last 6 H2H Matches:
(R1) Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Filderstadt(10-08-01)
Tatiana Panova
1
6
6
Amanda Coetzer
6
3
2
(R2) Family Circle Cup - Charleston, South Carolina(04-16-01)
Amanda Coetzer
6
6
Tatiana Panova
2
2
(R2) Bausch & Lomb Championships - Amelia Island, Florida(04-09-01)
Amanda Coetzer
7
3
Tatiana Panova
5
0
T. Panova vs A. Coetzer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $51,600 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.64% (277-270) | Career Total W/L | 62.88% (576-340) |
| 0 | Clay | 3 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 2 | Indoor | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 10 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Panova vs A. Coetzer Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tatiana Panova has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Amanda Coetzer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tatiana Panova, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Amanda Coetzer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tatiana Panova has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amanda Coetzer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tatiana Panova has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Amanda Coetzer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tatiana Panova has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 67% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 112/126). Amanda Coetzer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 196/89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 15/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Tatiana Panova has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Amanda Coetzer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Tatiana Panova winning 2 times and Amanda Coetzer being victorious 4 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Tatiana Panova winning 4 and Amanda Coetzer winning 9.
- The last match between Tatiana Panova and Amanda Coetzer was at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix - Filderstadt, 08-10-2001, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Tatiana Panova getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tatiana Panova has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Amanda Coetzer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tatiana Panova has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amanda Coetzer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tatiana Panova has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amanda Coetzer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tatiana Panova vs Amanda Coetzer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Panova vs A. Coetzer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 4 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 9 |
| 44 | Games Won | 65 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 33% (2/6) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (1/5) |
| 20% (1/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Panova 0%, Coetzer 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Panova 0%, Coetzer 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Panova 0%, Coetzer 0%.
T. Panova Recent Matches Played
A. Coetzer Recent Matches Played

T. Panova vs A. Coetzer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.64% (277/270) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.88% (576/340) |
| 50.08% (640/638) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.94% (1248/834) |
| 49.57% (5751/5851) | Games Win/Loss | 54.13% (10200/8645) |
| 47.06% (112/126) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.90% (269/152) |
| 46.56% (61/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.77% (196/89) |
| 58.40% (73/52) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.49% (69/60) |
| 58.00% (29/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 17 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.03 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 153 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 390.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 284.34 |
| 61% (903/1473) | 1st Serve % | 69% (404/583) |
| 56% (508/903) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (242/404) |
| 40% (223/563) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (89/179) |
| 50% (78/156) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (33/67) |
| 44% (649/1476) | Return Points Win % | 45% (271/597) |
| 44.93% (31/38) | Slam W/L | 64.17% (77/43) |
| 42.50% (34/46) | Masters W/L | 57.14% (44/33) |
| 77.78% (7/2) | Cups W/L | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 47.49% (123/136) | Main Tour W/L | 62.92% (168/99) |
| 74.65% (53/18) | Challenger W/L | 76.12% (51/16) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Futures W/L | 55.10% (27/22) |
| 51% (274/540) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (569/907) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (50/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (57/100) |
| 53% (99/187) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (157/261) |
| 80% (268/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (541/493) |
| 20% (268/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (541/48) |
| 22% (279/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (371/80) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
2.92
W2
1.37
05:30 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
1.7
W2
2.15
09:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
2.96
W2
1.36
04:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
3.94
W2
1.22
01:05 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
2.11
W2
1.67
12:00 PM 29/10/25
PredictionW1
4.4
W2
1.21
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
28 Oct 2025
Belinda Bencic vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 28th October 2025 Best Bets
28 Oct 2025
Valentin Vacherot vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 28th October 2025 Best Bets
28 Oct 2025
Anna Kalinskaya vs Kamilla Rakhimova Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 28th October 2025 Best Bets
28 Oct 2025
Corentin Moutet vs Reilly Opelka Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 28th October 2025 Best Bets
28 Oct 2025
Alexandra Eala vs Katie Boulter Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 28th October 2025 Best Bets
28 Oct 2025
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Francesco Maestrelli Prediction – ATP Bratislava 2 Challenger – 28th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
21:00
H2H 5-2
17:30
H2H 2-2
22:30
H2H 3-0
13:05
H2H 2-0
13:05
H2H 2-0
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Ibague
Colombia
M15 Malta
Malta
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M15 Trois-Rivieres
Canada
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Harlingen
United States
M25 Lajeado
Brazil
M25 Sintra
Portugal