Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Kacper Zuk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gabashvili vs Zuk analysis and find out who is favored!
Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Kacper Zuk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabashvili has won 42.24% of points on his second serve, while Zuk has won 56.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabashvili, in recent form, has won 57.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zuk has won 48.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.16% and 18.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabashvili has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zuk has saved 63.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabashvili has won 70.37% of matches played (W/L 19/ 8), with Zuk winning 42.86% (W/L 15/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabashvili has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 283/ 240), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19). Zuk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 87/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Gabashvili has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.37% of matches (W/L 19/ 8), where as Zuk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gabashvili winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gabashvili winning 1 and Zuk winning 2. The last match between Gabashvili and Zuk was at the Alicante Challenger, 11-10-2021, First, Hard with Kacper Zuk getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gabashvili and Zuk have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gabashvili winning 0 times and Zuk 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gabashvili winning 0, and Zuk 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabashvili has played against opponents with an average rank of 57.33 while Zuk has played against players with an average rank of 237.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabashvili has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zuk has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabashvili has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zuk has converted 29.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gabashvili 0 - 1 Zuk
11
Total
0
Mast
10
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
881
Rank
43
High
38
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
634
Rank
162
High
25
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
53% (654-590)
Career Total W/L
59% (226-155)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$1,636,260
Career Prize Money
$75,150
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gabashvili VS Zuk H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Teimuraz Gabashvili | Kacper Zuk |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 16 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 10 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 2:10:42 | 2:10:42 |
1st Serve % | 56% (54/97) | 52% (54/104) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (40/54) | 72% (39/54) |
2nd Serve Win% | 37% (16/43) | 52% (26/50) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 57% (4/7) |
Return Points W% | 38% (39/104) | 42% (41/97) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Gabashvili VS Zuk H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Kacper Zuk
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
52%
(
54 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Teimuraz Gabashvili | Kacper Zuk |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (48/55) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.4 |
Aces Total | 0 | 20 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 0 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:2 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 263.5 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (222/318) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (146/222) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (55/96) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 38% (8/21) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 30% (87/292) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Teimuraz Gabashvili Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Frederic Schlossmann
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Filippo Giovannini
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
100%
(
4 of
4)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
57%
(
4 of
7)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
100%
(
4 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Philip Henning
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Max Van Nunen
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Jasza Szajrych
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Maksim Shin
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Kacper Zuk Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Kacper Zuk
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alastair Gray
Player
Kacper Zuk
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
16
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
54 of
69)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kacper Zuk
Player
Viktor Frydrych
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Kacper Zuk
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Kacper Zuk
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
108)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anton Matusevich
Player
Kacper Zuk
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Kacper Zuk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
13
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
97%
(
38 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kacper Zuk
Player
Adrian Andreev
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kacper Zuk
Player
Jiri Vesely
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
10
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
63%
(
29 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kacper Zuk
Player
Petr Nouza
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
8
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more