Tennys Sandgren vs Mitchell Krueger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs Krueger analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs Mitchell Krueger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 51.07% of points on his second serve, while Krueger has won 52.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 48.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Krueger has won 51.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.3% and 30.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krueger has saved 59.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Krueger winning 54.1% (W/L 33/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Sandgren winning 4 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Sandgren winning 8 and Krueger winning 4. The last match between Sandgren and Krueger was at the Bloomfield Hills Challenger, 04-07-2023, First, Hard with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandgren and Krueger have played a deciding set 2 times, with Sandgren winning 2 times and Krueger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Sandgren winning 2, and Krueger 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.11 while Krueger has played against players with an average rank of 266.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krueger has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 30.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krueger has converted 42.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandgren 4 - 1 Krueger
16
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
11
Minor
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
4
Total1
3
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
56% (420-324)
Career Total W/L
53% (396-354)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$2,256,263
Career Prize Money
$697,038
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Tennys Sandgren | Mitchell Krueger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 4 | 1 |
Sets Won | 8 | 4 |
Games Won | 67 | 53 |
Aces (Total) | 34 | 22 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:35 | 1:9:35 |
1st Serve % | 64% (170/264) | 59% (139/236) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (121/170) | 73% (102/139) |
2nd Serve Win% | 51% (48/94) | 53% (51/97) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 41% (9/22) |
Return Points W% | 35% (83/236) | 36% (95/264) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-1 7-6(5) |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Mitchell Krueger
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
16
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
13
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
7-5 6-1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tennys Sandgren
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
6-2 7-5 | |||||
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tennys Sandgren | Mitchell Krueger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 62% (16/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) | 62% (38/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (272/238) | 52% (335/306) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 67% (10/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 63% (5/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.89 | 0.34 |
Aces Total | 221 | 109 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.16 |
DFs Total | 58 | 49 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:49 | 1:57:52 |
Avg Opp Rank | 300.8 | 327.12 |
1st Serve % | 60% (961/1606) | 66% (1313/2003) |
1st Serve W% | 78% (747/961) | 69% (910/1313) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (329/645) | 52% (361/690) |
BPs Won% Total | 32% (47/146) | 42% (79/188) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (575/1620) | 40% (853/2133) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 33% (1/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 65% (15/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 62% (16/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 71% (12/17) |
Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 33% (3/9) |
1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 88% (16/14) |
1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 13% (16/2) |
1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more