Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tennys Sandgren vs Tristan McCormick Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs McCormick analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs Tristan McCormick Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 51.07% of points on his second serve, while McCormick has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 48.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while McCormick has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.3% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McCormick has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with McCormick winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). McCormick has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as McCormick has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.11 while McCormick has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McCormick has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 30.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and McCormick has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandgren 0 - 0 McCormick
N/A
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tennys Sandgren | Tristan McCormick |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (272/238) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.89 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 221 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 58 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:49 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 300.8 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (961/1606) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (747/961) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (329/645) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (47/146) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (575/1620) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 1st Match |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan McCormick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Tristan Mccormick
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Arthur Gea
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tristan Mccormick
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Tristan Mccormick
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Tristan Mccormick
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Gergely Madarasz
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Tristan Mccormick
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Fenty
Player
Tristan Mccormick
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
7
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
9
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandgren Vs McCormick Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
