Terence Atmane vs Holger Rune Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Aug at 03:23 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Atmane vs H. Rune

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Atmane 1 - 0 Rune
They have played 2 sets in total, with Terence Atmane winning 2 and Holger Rune winning 0. The last match between Terence Atmane and Holger Rune was at the Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati, 14-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Terence Atmane getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Atmane | 1 |
| Rune | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati(08-14-25)
T. Atmane vs H. Rune H2H Profile
T. Atmane vs H. Rune Match Preview:
- Recent analysis shows Atmane winning 47.06% of second serve points, whereas Rune slightly edges ahead with 47.87%.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Atmane leads with a success rate of 44.62% over Rune's 43.56%.
- Both players have nearly identical success rates on first serve returns, with Rune's slight edge of 24.6% over Atmane's 24.16%.
- Under high-pressure conditions, Atmane saves breakpoints 64.94% of the time, outperforming Rune's 55.06%.
- Over the last year, Atmane has won 55.41% of his matches, compared to Rune's stronger 65.63% win rate.
- Hard courts are Atmane's best surface with a 65% win record, while Rune excels in indoor hard courts with 71% win percentage.
- Rune’s experience against higher-ranked opponents (average rank 56.13) significantly exceeds Atmane's opponent average rank (228.72).
- Atmane tends to convert 28.26% of break point opportunities, slightly lower than Rune's 30.56% conversion rate.
- In deciding set performances, Rune is more formidable, winning 67% of these scenarios, compared to Atmane's 53%.
Editorial Prediction (August 14, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head statistics provide a compelling case for evaluating the likely victor in the upcoming match.
Atmane exhibits a robust second serve and return game, notably under pressure; however, Rune’s slightly higher breakpoint conversion and more frequent encounters with higher-ranked players give him an edge in competitive experience.
Moreover, Rune enjoys a marked advantage on his best surface, the indoor hard courts, a factor that could influence the match outcome should it be played on a similar surface.
Taking into account all relevant performance metrics and previous match experience, Rune emerges as the probable winner of the forthcoming tennis face-off.
Terence Atmane vs Holger Rune Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Atmane vs H. Rune H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:13:43 | Average Match Time | 1:13:43 |
| 62% (33/53) | 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) |
| 85% (28/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (20/33) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 47% (27/57) | Return Points Win % | 32% (17/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Atmane Recent Matches Played
H. Rune Recent Matches Played

T. Atmane vs H. Rune Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.56% (238/155) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.23% (287/153) |
| 58.61% (541/382) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.44% (674/423) |
| 52.64% (4755/4278) | Games Win/Loss | 53.23% (5615/4934) |
| 65.16% (187/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.20% (71/51) |
| 55.07% (38/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.69% (132/63) |
| 36.00% (9/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 70.59% (72/30) |
| 33.33% (4/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (12/9) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 2288 | Aces Total | 1829 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1332 | Total Double Faults | 1253 |
| 1:40:25 | Average Match Time | 1:48:6 |
| 379.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 279.31 |
| 59% (16558/27841) | 1st Serve % | 63% (20082/32118) |
| 72% (11940/16558) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (14216/20082) |
| 52% (5866/11283) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (6431/12036) |
| 42% (1012/2386) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1279/3030) |
| 38% (10330/27294) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12539/32441) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 65.31% (32/17) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Masters W/L | 63.44% (59/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 42.86% (15/20) | Main Tour W/L | 63.27% (93/54) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 62.16% (92/56) | Challenger W/L | 69.57% (48/21) |
| 65.43% (106/56) | Futures W/L | 71.88% (46/18) |
| 61% (234/383) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (253/383) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 59% (91/155) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (105/173) |
| 53% (74/140) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (86/147) |
| 86% (243/209) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (267/235) |
| 14% (243/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (267/32) |
| 20% (148/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (173/52) |