Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Terence Atmane vs Radu Florin Macovei Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atmane vs Macovei analysis and find out who is favored!
Terence Atmane vs Radu Florin Macovei Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atmane has won 51.46% of points on his second serve, while Macovei has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atmane, in recent form, has won 48.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Macovei has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atmane has saved 70.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Macovei has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atmane has won 64.2% of matches played (W/L 52/ 29), with Macovei winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9). Macovei has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 19/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13), where as Macovei has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Atmane winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Atmane winning 2 and Macovei winning 0. The last match between Atmane and Macovei was at the M15 Doha, 21-10-2021, Second, Hard with Terence Atmane getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Atmane and Macovei have played a deciding set 0 times, with Atmane winning 0 times and Macovei 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Atmane winning 0, and Macovei 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atmane has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.44 while Macovei has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atmane has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Macovei has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atmane has converted 43.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Macovei has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Atmane 1 - 0 Macovei
134
Rank
127
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
64% (179-102)
Career Total W/L
41% (28-40)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$243,885
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Terence Atmane | Radu Florin Macovei |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:55:0 | 0:55:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (26/38) | 53% (25/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (23/26) | 60% (15/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (9/12) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (25/47) | 16% (6/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
Radu Florin Macovei
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
13
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Terence Atmane | Radu Florin Macovei |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (33/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (293/286) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.62 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 176 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 191.83 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1101/1896) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (801/1101) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (390/795) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (62/141) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (617/1723) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Zachary Svajda
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Sebastian Ofner
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Bor Artnak
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Terence Atmane
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Terence Atmane
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
101)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Radu Florin Macovei Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Radu Florin Macovei
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Gheorghe Claudiu Schinteie
Player
Radu Florin Macovei
44%
(
14 of
32)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
89%
(
16 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Radu Florin Macovei
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Florin Macovei
Player
Tudor Stefan Gheorghita
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
18 of
29)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
41
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Atmane Vs Macovei Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Terence Atmane
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
