Prediction of Tessa Price vs Rachel Ann Jensen Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Price vs R. Ann Jensen

Tessa Price

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

101

Best Rank

237

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Rachel Ann Jensen

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

101

Best Rank

237

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Price 1 - 0 Jensen

They have played 3 sets in total, with Tessa Price winning 2 and Rachel Ann Jensen winning 1. The last match between Tessa Price and Rachel Ann Jensen was at the ITF York, 10-08-1992, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Tessa Price getting the victory 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Price	1
Jensen	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF York(08-10-92)

Stats

Tessa Price

Rachel Ann Jensen

T. Price vs R. A. Jensen H2H Profile

T. Price	Stats	R. A. Jensen
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
61.47% (134-84)	Career Total W/L	48.98% (72-75)
1	Hard	0
9	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Price vs R. A. Jensen Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tessa Price has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tessa Price, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tessa Price has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rachel Ann Jensen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tessa Price has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Rachel Ann Jensen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tessa Price has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 98/53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/7). Rachel Ann Jensen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 18/16), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Tessa Price has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Rachel Ann Jensen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tessa Price winning 1 times and Rachel Ann Jensen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tessa Price winning 2 and Rachel Ann Jensen winning 1.
The last match between Tessa Price and Rachel Ann Jensen was at the ITF York, 10-08-1992, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Tessa Price getting the victory 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tessa Price has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Rachel Ann Jensen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tessa Price has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tessa Price has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rachel Ann Jensen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tessa Price vs Rachel Ann Jensen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Price vs R. A. Jensen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Price	Stats	R. A. Jensen
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Price Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1996
Q1 Tara SnyderT. Snyder	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Eastbourne - 18-06-1996
Q1 Meghann ShaughnessyM. Shaughnessy	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Birmingham - 10-06-1996
Q1 Nicole PrattN. Pratt	L	6-4 4-2 RET	Stats
Guimaraes 10K - 30-04-1996
R4 Diane AsensioD. Asensio	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
R3 Julia Carballal FernandezJ. Carballal	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

R. A. Jensen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Houston - 10-04-1995
Q1 Alix CreekA. Creek	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Jakarta - 02-01-1995
Q1 Elena TatarkovaE. Tatarkova	L	2-6 7-6 6-0	Stats
ITF Nuriootpa - 05-12-1994
Q1 Justine HodderJ. Hodder	L	6-3 2-1 RET	Stats
ITF Port Pirie - 28-11-1994
Q2 Trudi MusgraveT. Musgrave	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
Q1 Jenny Ann FetchJ. Ann	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Price vs R. A. Jensen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Price	Stats	R. A. Jensen
61.47% (134/84)	YTD Win/Loss	48.98% (72/75)
60.12% (303/201)	Sets Win/Loss	49.09% (161/167)
55.03% (2502/2045)	Games Win/Loss	49.64% (1513/1535)
64.90% (98/53)	Hard Win/Loss	48.98% (48/50)
36.36% (4/7)	Clay Win/Loss	52.94% (18/16)
64.29% (9/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (6/6)
54.17% (13/11)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
421.64	Average Opponent Rank	495.2
25.00% (1/3)	Slam W/L	50.00% (2/2)
71.32% (97/39)	Challenger W/L	54.43% (43/36)
55.56% (10/8)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/3)
62% (133/216)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (71/145)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
52% (11/21)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	61% (19/31)
48% (33/69)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (19/38)
90% (125/112)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (70/61)
10% (125/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (70/9)
23% (92/21)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (75/10)