Thelma Long vs Connie Coate Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Long vs C. Coate

Thelma Long

AUS

5

Win

Played

1

Win

106

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Connie Coate

AUS

5

Win

Played

1

Win

106

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Long 5 - 1 Coate

They have played 17 sets in total, with Thelma Long winning 13 and Connie Coate winning 4. The last match between Thelma Long and Connie Coate was at the Australian Championships, 17-01-1947, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Thelma Long getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Long	5
Coate	1

Last H2H Matches:

() Australian Championships(01-17-47)

Stats

Thelma Long

Connie Coate

() Adelaide(01-04-47)

Stats

Thelma Long

Connie Coate

(SF) Melbourne(11-27-46)

Stats

Thelma Long

Connie Coate

T. Long vs C. Coate H2H Profile

T. Long	Stats	C. Coate
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
75.99% (516-163)	Career Total W/L	54.10% (33-28)
0	Clay	1
5	Grass	0
2	Titles	0
5	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Long vs C. Coate Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thelma Long has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Connie Coate has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thelma Long, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Connie Coate has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Thelma Long has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Connie Coate has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Thelma Long has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Connie Coate winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Thelma Long has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 77% (W/L 144/ 42), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 17/ 7). Connie Coate has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 78% (W/L 7/ 2), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
Player level: In the last year, Thelma Long has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Connie Coate has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 7 times before with Thelma Long winning 6 times and Connie Coate being victorious 1 times. They have played 17 sets in total, with Thelma Long winning 13 and Connie Coate winning 4. The last match between Thelma Long and Connie Coate was at the Australian Championships, 17-01-1947, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Thelma Long getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Thelma Long and Connie Coate have played a deciding set 3 times, with Thelma Long winning 2 times and Connie Coate 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thelma Long has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Connie Coate has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thelma Long has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Connie Coate has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Thelma Long has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Connie Coate has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Thelma Long vs Connie Coate Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Long vs C. Coate H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Long	Stats	C. Coate
6	H2H Matches Won	1
13	Sets Won	4
93	Games Won	56
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
86% (6/7)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	14% (1/7)
67% (2/3)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (1/3)
80% (4/5)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/2)
20% (1/5)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	100% (2/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	20% (1/5)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Long Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Launceston - 26-03-1959
F Lynette BowdenL. Bowden	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Warrnambool - 05-03-1959
F Beverley RaeB. Rae	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Australian Championships - 16-01-1959
R3 Eva DuldigE. Duldig	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Sydney Manly - 26-12-1958
SF Noelene TurnerN. Turner	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
F Mary HawtonM. Hawton	W	7-5 4-6 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Coate Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sydney - 19-11-1947
SF Nancye Wynne BoltonN. Wynne	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
R3 Beryl PenroseB. Penrose	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R4 Esme AshfordE. Ashford	W	3-6 9-7 6-4	Stats
Dorothy JenkinsD. Jenkins	W	6-3 7-5	Stats
Melbourne MCC Chps - 11-03-1947
SF Nancye Wynne BoltonN. Wynne	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Long vs C. Coate Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Long	Stats	C. Coate
75.99% (516/163)	YTD Win/Loss	54.10% (33/28)
73.98% (1072/377)	Sets Win/Loss	51.82% (71/66)
61.78% (7928/4905)	Games Win/Loss	51.57% (642/603)
70.83% (17/7)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
77.42% (144/42)	Clay Win/Loss	77.78% (7/2)
91.30% (21/2)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
74.70% (248/84)	Grass Win/Loss	52.08% (25/23)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
70.48% (74/31)	Slam W/L	50.00% (6/6)
77% (508/656)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (33/61)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
59% (79/134)	Deciding Set Win %	67% (10/15)
95% (490/464)	1st Set Won, Won Match	93% (27/25)
5% (490/25)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	7% (27/2)
26% (168/44)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (34/8)