Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiemo De Bakker vs Fabricio Neis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bakker vs Neis analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiemo De Bakker vs Fabricio Neis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Neis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Neis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Neis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Neis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Neis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Neis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Neis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bakker 0 - 0 Neis
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
33
Age
L
Plays
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fabricio Neis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sergio Galdos
Player
Fabricio Neis
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Fabricio Neis
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
28 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(3) 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Vega Hernandez
Player
Fabricio Neis
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Fabricio Neis
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
5
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabricio Neis
Player
Felipe Mantilla
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Souza
Player
Fabricio Neis
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Fabricio Neis
Player
Fernando Yamacita
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabricio Neis
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
68 of
113)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Fabricio Neis
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
12
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabricio Neis
Player
Sebastiano Mahoro Zorzi
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
33%
(
23 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bakker Vs Neis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
