Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thomas Fancutt vs Dane Sweeny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fancutt vs Sweeny analysis and find out who is favored!
Thomas Fancutt vs Dane Sweeny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fancutt has won 49.59% of points on his second serve, while Sweeny has won 51.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fancutt, in recent form, has won 44.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sweeny has won 47.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.35% and 34.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fancutt has saved 55.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sweeny has saved 56.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fancutt has won 43.24% of matches played (W/L 16/ 21), with Sweeny winning 50% (W/L 31/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Sweeny has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 135/ 85), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Fancutt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11), where as Sweeny has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fancutt winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fancutt winning 2 and Sweeny winning 2. The last match between Fancutt and Sweeny was at the M15 Caloundra, 25-07-2022, Final, Hard with Dane Sweeny getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fancutt and Sweeny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fancutt winning 0 times and Sweeny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fancutt winning 0, and Sweeny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fancutt has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.68 while Sweeny has played against players with an average rank of 349.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fancutt has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sweeny has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fancutt has converted 44.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sweeny has converted 37.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fancutt 1 - 1 Sweeny
779
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
224
Rank
194
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
53% (228-200)
Career Total W/L
58% (161-118)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
61% (14-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$274,065
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Thomas Fancutt | Dane Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:30 | 1:18:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (61/109) | 68% (70/103) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (45/61) | 57% (40/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (22/48) | 52% (17/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 33% (4/12) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (46/103) | 39% (42/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Dane Sweeny
Player
Thomas Fancutt
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Dane Sweeny
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
13
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thomas Fancutt | Dane Sweeny |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 61% (14/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (13/19) | 56% (33/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (148/159) | 51% (282/270) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 61% (14/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.78 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 118 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:21 | 1:53:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.2 | 341.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (527/937) | 64% (1127/1764) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (385/527) | 66% (745/1127) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (203/410) | 52% (329/637) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (32/65) | 42% (73/174) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (325/926) | 40% (712/1769) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 62% (13/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 45% (11/5) |
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yanki Erel
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
45 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
5
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Maxime Janvier
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
0
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
9
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Dane Sweeny
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fancutt Vs Sweeny Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dane Sweeny
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
