Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thomas Fancutt vs Nick Chappell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fancutt vs Chappell analysis and find out who is favored!
Thomas Fancutt vs Nick Chappell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fancutt has won 48.78% of points on his second serve, while Chappell has won 49.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fancutt, in recent form, has won 46.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chappell has won 52.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.66% and 33.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fancutt has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chappell has saved 56.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fancutt has won 43.24% of matches played (W/L 16/ 21), with Chappell winning 51.9% (W/L 41/ 38) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 216/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Fancutt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11), where as Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fancutt winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fancutt winning 2 and Chappell winning 0. The last match between Fancutt and Chappell was at the M25 Albury, 27-02-2019, First, Grass with Thomas Fancutt getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fancutt and Chappell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fancutt winning 0 times and Chappell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fancutt winning 1, and Chappell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fancutt has played against opponents with an average rank of 185.68 while Chappell has played against players with an average rank of 255.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fancutt has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chappell has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fancutt has converted 45.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chappell has converted 42.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fancutt 1 - 0 Chappell
784
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
443
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
53% (228-200)
Career Total W/L
53% (300-264)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$24,525
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Thomas Fancutt | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:0 | 1:49:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (45/83) | 60% (41/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (35/45) | 76% (31/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (20/38) | 56% (15/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (22/68) | 34% (28/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Nick Chappell
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thomas Fancutt | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (13/19) | 42% (21/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (148/159) | 48% (222/243) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 50% (8/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.78 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 118 | 40 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:21 | 1:43:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.2 | 291.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (527/937) | 62% (914/1483) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (385/527) | 65% (594/914) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (203/410) | 47% (270/569) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (32/65) | 39% (63/162) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (325/926) | 40% (611/1543) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (7/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Fancutt Vs Chappell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
