Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Handel vs Neo Niedner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Handel vs Niedner analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Handel vs Neo Niedner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Handel has won 49.73% of points on his second serve, while Niedner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Handel, in recent form, has won 48.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Niedner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Handel has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niedner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Handel has won 64.2% of matches played (W/L 52/ 29), with Niedner winning 33.33% (W/L 2/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Handel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 113/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14). Niedner has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Handel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.21% of matches (W/L 47/ 19), where as Niedner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Handel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Handel winning 2 and Niedner winning 0. The last match between Handel and Niedner was at the M25 Frankfurt am Main, 09-08-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Tim Handel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Handel and Niedner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Handel winning 0 times and Niedner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Handel winning 0, and Niedner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Handel has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.54 while Niedner has played against players with an average rank of 66.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Handel has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niedner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Handel has converted 39.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niedner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Handel 1 - 0 Niedner
370
Rank
363
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
60% (162-107)
Career Total W/L
29% (8-20)
56% (9-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tim Handel | Neo Niedner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (39/55) | 49% (28/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (30/39) | 64% (18/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (8/16) | 34% (10/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (29/57) | 31% (17/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Tim Handel
Player
Neo Niedner
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Handel | Neo Niedner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (19/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (173/171) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 62 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 122.81 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (684/1145) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (483/684) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (223/461) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (39/106) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (432/1135) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (9/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tim Handel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Tim Handel
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Samuel Brosset
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Tristan Berard
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
19 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Tim Handel
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Nino Serdarusic
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Emilien Voisin
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Louroi Martinez
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Tim Handel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Mika Lipp
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Tim Handel
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
23
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Neo Niedner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Neo Niedner
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aldin Setkic
Player
Neo Niedner
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Neo Niedner
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neo Niedner
Player
Csongor Hejjas
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Neo Niedner
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Neo Niedner
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
122)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
122)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Neo Niedner
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Handel Vs Niedner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
