Tim Sandkaulen vs Stijn Pel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandkaulen vs Pel analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Sandkaulen vs Stijn Pel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandkaulen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Pel has won 52.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandkaulen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pel has won 47.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandkaulen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pel has saved 57.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandkaulen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Pel winning 56.86% (W/L 29/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandkaulen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 30/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6). Pel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sandkaulen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sandkaulen winning 2 and Pel winning 0. The last match between Sandkaulen and Pel was at the M15 Meerbusch, 02-05-2022, Q2 round, Clay with Tim Sandkaulen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandkaulen and Pel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sandkaulen winning 0 times and Pel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sandkaulen winning 0, and Pel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandkaulen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Pel has played against players with an average rank of 58.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandkaulen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pel has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandkaulen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pel has converted 36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandkaulen 1 - 0 Pel
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
62% (73-44)
Career Total W/L
56% (57-44)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sandkaulen VS Pel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Tim Sandkaulen | Stijn Pel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sandkaulen VS Pel H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tim Sandkaulen | Stijn Pel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (11/11) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (108/110) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.54 |
Aces Total | 0 | 58 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.21 |
DFs Total | 0 | 23 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:32:21 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 215.27 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (456/714) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (318/456) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (132/258) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (23/68) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (244/695) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Tim Sandkaulen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jannik Opitz
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
9
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matthew William Donald
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Billy Harris
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Stijn Pel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stijn Pel
Player
Liova Ajavon
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stijn Pel
Player
Phoenix Weir
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Antoine Hoang
Player
Stijn Pel
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leonardo Malgaroli
Player
Stijn Pel
49%
(
43 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stijn Pel
Player
Matteo Fondriest
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Stijn Pel
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve %
65%
(
15 of
23)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
27
Total Points Won
13
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Stijn Pel
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H |
view more