Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Mitchell Krueger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rijthoven vs Krueger analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Mitchell Krueger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rijthoven has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Krueger has won 52.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rijthoven, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Krueger has won 51.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rijthoven has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krueger has saved 59.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rijthoven has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Krueger winning 54.1% (W/L 33/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47). Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rijthoven winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Rijthoven winning 3 and Krueger winning 2. The last match between Rijthoven and Krueger was at the Hall of Fame Open - Newport, 12-07-2022, First, Grass with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rijthoven and Krueger have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rijthoven winning 0 times and Krueger 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rijthoven winning 0, and Krueger 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rijthoven has played against opponents with an average rank of while Krueger has played against players with an average rank of 266.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rijthoven has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krueger has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rijthoven has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krueger has converted 42.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rijthoven 1 - 1 Krueger
871
Rank
101
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
62% (234-141)
Career Total W/L
53% (396-354)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$499,600
Career Prize Money
$697,038
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 20 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:12 | 2:0:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (89/157) | 69% (111/162) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (66/89) | 68% (75/111) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (40/68) | 49% (25/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (62/162) | 32% (51/157) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
107)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (38/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (335/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (10/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 109 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:57:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 327.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (1313/2003) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (910/1313) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (361/690) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (79/188) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (853/2133) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Rijthoven Vs Krueger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
