Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timo Stodder vs Jakub Mensik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stodder vs Mensik analysis and find out who is favored!
Timo Stodder vs Jakub Mensik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stodder has won 47.69% of points on his second serve, while Mensik has won 51.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stodder, in recent form, has won 52.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mensik has won 49.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.95% and 27.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stodder has saved 54.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mensik has saved 68.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stodder has won 55.88% of matches played (W/L 38/ 30), with Mensik winning 64.18% (W/L 43/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11). Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 35/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Stodder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 19/ 19), where as Mensik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stodder winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stodder winning 2 and Mensik winning 0. The last match between Stodder and Mensik was at the M15 Bytom, 10-06-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Timo Stodder getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stodder and Mensik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stodder winning 0 times and Mensik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stodder winning 0, and Mensik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stodder has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.19 while Mensik has played against players with an average rank of 227.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stodder has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mensik has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stodder has converted 45.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mensik has converted 40.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stodder 1 - 0 Mensik
325
Rank
257
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
74
Rank
69
High
18
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
65% (196-106)
Career Total W/L
65% (93-50)
36% (4-7)
YTD W/L
72% (18-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$593,365
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Timo Stodder | Jakub Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (32/55) | 46% (26/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (21/32) | 58% (15/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (16/23) | 39% (12/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (30/57) | 33% (18/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Timo Stodder
Player
Jakub Mensik
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timo Stodder | Jakub Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (4/7) | 72% (18/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (9/16) | 68% (40/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (109/135) | 53% (314/278) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (17/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.76 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 220 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 30 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:46 | 1:45:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.18 | 190.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (490/791) | 60% (1132/1889) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (300/490) | 75% (849/1132) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (139/301) | 53% (403/757) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (31/59) | 43% (54/126) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (310/792) | 35% (630/1793) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 71% (5/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (4/10) | 74% (17/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 69% (9/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 17% (6/1) |
Timo Stodder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Denis Petak
75%
(
67 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Marko Maksimovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Timo Stodder
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
49%
(
63 of
129)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Timo Stodder
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Timo Stodder
43%
(
32 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
8
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(7) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Borna Coric
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
18
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
9
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Gael Monfils
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Andrey Rublev
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
10
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
19 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Andy Murray
62%
(
77 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
121)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
45 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stodder Vs Mensik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jakub Mensik
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
