Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tobias Kamke vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kamke vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Tobias Kamke vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kamke has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 50.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kamke, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 53.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kamke has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 56.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kamke has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Michalski winning 58.06% (W/L 36/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kamke has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 165/ 127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 123/ 123). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kamke has played against opponents with an average rank of while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 237.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kamke has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kamke has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 46.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kamke 0 - 0 Michalski
842
Rank
64
High
37
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
318
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
53% (552-486)
Career Total W/L
62% (212-128)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$1,074,711
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tobias Kamke | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (27/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (250/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 322.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1048/1680) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (661/1048) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (322/632) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (70/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (654/1605) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Tobias Kamke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Marko Topo
Player
Tobias Kamke
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Tobias Kamke
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
67%
(
16 of
24)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Tiago Cacao
72%
(
91 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Tobias Kamke
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Tobias Kamke
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Henri Squire
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Tobias Kamke
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamke Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
