Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tobias Kamke vs Michal Przysiezny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kamke vs Przysiezny analysis and find out who is favored!
Tobias Kamke vs Michal Przysiezny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kamke has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Przysiezny has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kamke, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Przysiezny has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kamke has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Przysiezny has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kamke has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Przysiezny winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kamke has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 165/ 127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 123/ 123). Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Kamke winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Kamke winning 4 and Przysiezny winning 2. The last match between Kamke and Przysiezny was at the Kyoto Challenger, 22-02-2018, Second, Carpet with Tobias Kamke getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:45:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kamke and Przysiezny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kamke winning 0 times and Przysiezny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kamke winning 0, and Przysiezny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kamke has played against opponents with an average rank of while Przysiezny has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kamke has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Przysiezny has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kamke has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Przysiezny has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kamke 2 - 1 Przysiezny
842
Rank
64
High
37
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
53% (552-486)
Career Total W/L
56% (465-368)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,074,711
Career Prize Money
$403,630
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kamke VS Przysiezny H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tobias Kamke | Michal Przysiezny |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 31 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:45:14 | 0:45:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (64/107) | 53% (59/111) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (53/64) | 71% (42/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (29/43) | 44% (23/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/7) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (46/111) | 23% (25/107) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Kamke VS Przysiezny H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tobias Kamke | Michal Przysiezny |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tobias Kamke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Tobias Kamke
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Tobias Kamke
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
67%
(
16 of
24)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Tiago Cacao
72%
(
91 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Tobias Kamke
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Tobias Kamke
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Henri Squire
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Tobias Kamke
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kamke Vs Przysiezny Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
