Tom Kocevar-Desman vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kocevar-Desman vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
Tom Kocevar-Desman vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Naow has won 51.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kocevar-Desman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 56.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kocevar-Desman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 63.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Naow winning 70.59% (W/L 60/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kocevar-Desman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 98/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Naow has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 19/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 54/ 35).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kocevar-Desman winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kocevar-Desman winning 2 and Naow winning 2. The last match between Kocevar-Desman and Naow was at the M15 Troisdorf, 10-05-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Tom Kocevar-Desman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kocevar-Desman and Naow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kocevar-Desman winning 0 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kocevar-Desman winning 0, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kocevar-Desman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 183.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kocevar-Desman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 46.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kocevar-Desman 1 - 1 Naow
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
890
Rank
349
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
333
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
55% (239-197)
Career Total W/L
67% (151-76)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
81% (26-6)
$675
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kocevar-Desman VS Naow H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Tom Kocevar-Desman | Hazem Naow |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 17 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kocevar-Desman VS Naow H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 | |||||
6-4 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tom Kocevar-Desman | Hazem Naow |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 81% (26/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 74% (53/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (394/281) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (19/5) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.22 |
Aces Total | 0 | 73 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.36 |
DFs Total | 0 | 117 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:38:26 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 227.69 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1409/2230) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (995/1409) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (412/821) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (117/257) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (944/2175) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (14/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (12/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 81% (26/32) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/8) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (22/22) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (22/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 40% (10/4) |
Tom Kocevar-Desman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
David Poljak
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
92%
(
44 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Simonas Zukauskas
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hanwen Li
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Digvijaypratap Singh
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
30 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oscar Moraing
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Alexis Canter
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zsombor Velcz
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Savva Polukhin
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Lucas Poullain
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more