Tomas Lanik vs Beibit Zhukayev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Oct at 10:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Lanik vs B. Zhukayev

SVK
0
Win
Played
1
Win

KAZ
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Lanik 0 - 1 Zhukayev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tomas Lanik winning 0 and Beibit Zhukayev winning 2. The last match between Beibit Zhukayev and Tomas Lanik was at the Bratislava 2 Challenger, 26-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Beibit Zhukayev getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lanik | 0 |
| Zhukayev | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Bratislava 2 Challenger(10-26-25)
T. Lanik vs B. Zhukayev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $347,285 |
| 50.53% (96-94) | Career Total W/L | 51.57% (197-185) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
T. Lanik vs B. Zhukayev Match Preview:
- When it comes to recent second serve performance, Beibit Zhukayev shows an edge with 46.25% of points won, surpassing Tomas Lanik who has won 41.00%.
- Tomas Lanik excels in return games, capturing 48.94% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Beibit Zhukayev's 43.75%.
- First serve return performance also favors Lanik, winning 23.57% of points, while Zhukayev manages 20.41%.
- In pressure situations, such as saving breakpoints, Zhukayev performs better, saving 53.93% against Lanik’s 40.63%.
- Looking at match wins over the past year, Zhukayev boasts a higher win percentage at 44.64% (25/31), whereas Lanik holds 33.33% (4/8).
- Both players find success on different surfaces. Lanik's strength lies on clay (53% win rate), and Zhukayev is most successful on grass (53% win rate).
- Analyzing player level, Lanik has been active more in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a 44.44% win rate, while Zhukayev competes in higher-ranked Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 41.03% of his matches.
- Description: What does head-to-head data suggest in this specific match? Given that Lanik plays against opponents with a higher average rank (247), it could imply a competitive edge.
- In deciding sets, Zhukayev is more likely to emerge victorious, winning 36% of these crucial matches, whereas Lanik has yet to win a deciding set in the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 25, 2025, UTC):
In terms of second serve performance and crucial breakpoint situations, Beibit Zhukayev holds a slight advantage over Tomas Lanik. Zhukayev has demonstrated resilience at high-pressure moments, making him a formidable competitor under tense conditions.
While Tomas Lanik showcases superior return statistics, particularly on second serve returns, his struggle in deciding sets presents a notable concern. Zhukayev's ability to close out tough matches more effectively may prove decisive in a tightly contested encounter.
Overall, though both players excel on different surfaces and play at varying tournament levels, Zhukayev’s consistency and higher match win percentage position him as the favorite for this contest. Based on this analysis, Beibit Zhukayev is the most likely winner of the upcoming match.
Tomas Lanik vs Beibit Zhukayev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Lanik vs B. Zhukayev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:59:40 | Average Match Time | 0:59:40 |
| 53% (30/57) | 1st Serve % | 74% (32/43) |
| 67% (20/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 94% (30/32) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 91% (10/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Pts Won % | 22% (2/9) |
| 7% (3/43) | Return Points Win % | 40% (23/57) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Lanik Recent Matches Played
B. Zhukayev Recent Matches Played

T. Lanik vs B. Zhukayev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.53% (96/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.57% (197/185) |
| 50.93% (220/212) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.35% (456/432) |
| 51.02% (2107/2023) | Games Win/Loss | 50.37% (4437/4372) |
| 53.23% (33/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.34% (114/92) |
| 52.73% (58/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 39.74% (31/47) |
| 27.78% (5/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.95% (40/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (12/9) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.75 |
| 385 | Aces Total | 3217 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 409 | Total Double Faults | 1388 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 320.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 398.02 |
| 58% (4308/7406) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14783/25144) |
| 66% (2823/4308) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (11205/14783) |
| 47% (1462/3098) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5035/10361) |
| 42% (280/665) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (717/1814) |
| 39% (2820/7285) | Return Points Win % | 35% (8406/24195) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (2/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 45.83% (11/13) |
| 0.00% (0/7) | Challenger W/L | 47.70% (83/91) |
| 52.46% (96/87) | Futures W/L | 55.41% (87/70) |
| 50% (93/185) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (193/375) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 44% (19/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (94/181) |
| 46% (25/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (58/120) |
| 82% (97/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (200/165) |
| 18% (97/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (200/35) |
| 17% (93/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (182/31) |