Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Machac vs Kimmer Coppejans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Machac vs Coppejans analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Machac vs Kimmer Coppejans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Machac has won 53.24% of points on his second serve, while Coppejans has won 46.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Machac, in recent form, has won 49.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coppejans has won 53.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.39% and 27.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Machac has saved 65.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coppejans has saved 60.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Machac has won 67.57% of matches played (W/L 50/ 24), with Coppejans winning 52.5% (W/L 21/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Machac has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 84/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4). Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Machac has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 22/ 10), where as Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Machac winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Machac winning 4 and Coppejans winning 0. The last match between Machac and Coppejans was at the Ismaning Challenger, 25-10-2021, First, Carpet with Tomas Machac getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Machac and Coppejans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Machac winning 0 times and Coppejans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Machac winning 0, and Coppejans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Machac has played against opponents with an average rank of 242.73 while Coppejans has played against players with an average rank of 246.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Machac has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coppejans has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Machac has converted 41.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coppejans has converted 25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Machac 2 - 0 Coppejans
50
Rank
43
High
23
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
250
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
67% (235-115)
Career Total W/L
57% (418-314)
68% (15-7)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$1,161,000
Career Prize Money
$294,830
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tomas Machac | Kimmer Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:7 | 1:6:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (72/109) | 55% (54/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (54/72) | 69% (37/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (24/37) | 42% (19/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (43/99) | 28% (31/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Tomas Machac
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Machac | Kimmer Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (15/7) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (35/19) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (294/252) | 48% (45/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:23 | 1:54:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.91 | 250.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1068/1673) | 61% (174/286) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (790/1068) | 72% (125/174) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (317/605) | 48% (54/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (64/155) | 23% (8/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (641/1713) | 36% (119/327) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (13/19) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 50% (4/2) |
Tomas Machac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Juncheng Shang
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tomas Machac
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Andy Murray
59%
(
77 of
130)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
110)
6
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
35%
(
45 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
110)
123
Total Points Won
117
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Andrey Rublev
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Darwin Blanch
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Tomas Machac
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Stan Wawrinka
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tomas Machac
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Machac Vs Coppejans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tomas Machac
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
