search

Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Federico Gaio Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Etcheverry vs Gaio analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Federico Gaio Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Etcheverry has won 51.07% of points on his second serve, while Gaio has won 48.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Etcheverry, in recent form, has won 49.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gaio has won 48.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.31% and 25.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Etcheverry has saved 63.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaio has saved 58.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Etcheverry has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Gaio winning 44.44% (W/L 24/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Etcheverry has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 282/ 140), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 323/ 250), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9).
  • Player level: In the last year, Etcheverry has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13), where as Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 21/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Etcheverry winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Etcheverry winning 2 and Gaio winning 2. The last match between Etcheverry and Gaio was at the Cordenons Challenger, 05-08-2021, Second, Clay with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:52.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Etcheverry and Gaio have played a deciding set 0 times, with Etcheverry winning 0 times and Gaio 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Etcheverry winning 0, and Gaio 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Etcheverry has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.16 while Gaio has played against players with an average rank of 265.15.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Etcheverry has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaio has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Etcheverry has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaio has converted 32.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Etcheverry 1 - 1 Gaio

Tomas Martin Etcheverry

8

Total

0

Mast

3

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

5

Minor

30

Rank

27

High

24

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

247

Rank

124

High

32

Age

R

Plays

Federico Gaio

13

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

9

Minor

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L W W L W L W W W

Form

L L W L L L W L L L

64% (324-183)

Career Total W/L

54% (515-433)

55% (11-9)

YTD W/L

21% (3-11)

$1,807,385

Career Prize Money

$392,005

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Etcheverry VS Gaio H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Tomas Martin Etcheverry Federico Gaio
All H2H Matches 1 1
Sets Won 2 2
Games Won 16 19
Aces (Total) 4 3
DFs (Total) 0 4
Avg Match Time 1:18:52 1:18:52
1st Serve % 78% (81/104) 53% (51/96)
1st Serve Win% 67% (54/81) 82% (42/51)
2nd Serve Win% 57% (13/23) 62% (28/45)
BPs Won% (Total) 25% (2/8) 50% (4/8)
Return Points W% 27% (26/96) 36% (37/104)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)

Etcheverry VS Gaio H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-3
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Federico Gaio
76% ( 37 of 49)
1st Serve %
54% ( 29 of 54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
89% ( 33 of 37)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 22 of 29)
58% ( 7 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
18% ( 9 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 18 of 54)
58
Total Points Won
45
6-2 6-2
cross
Federico Gaio
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
52% ( 22 of 42)
1st Serve %
80% ( 44 of 55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
91% ( 20 of 22)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 21 of 44)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 6 of 11)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
19% ( 8 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 28 of 55)
62
Total Points Won
35

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Tomas Martin Etcheverry Federico Gaio
YTD W/L 55% (11/9) 21% (3/11)
Sets Win/Loss 57% (27/20) 24% (8/25)
Games Win/Loss 52% (246/229) 40% (123/182)
Hard Win/Loss 33% (2/4) 22% (2/7)
Clay Win/Loss 64% (9/5) 20% (1/4)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.46 0.38
Aces Total 107 56
DFs per game 0.09 0.35
DFs Total 22 52
Avg Match Time 2:9:35 1:40:26
Avg Opp Rank 152.55 237.07
1st Serve % 69% (1045/1524) 56% (538/965)
1st Serve W% 70% (733/1045) 67% (359/538)
2nd Serve W% 49% (236/479) 47% (200/427)
BPs Won% Total 37% (50/135) 31% (22/71)
Return Pts W% 36% (542/1491) 33% (326/977)
Slam W/L 67% (2/1) 50% (1/1)
Masters W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/1)
Cups W/L 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 62% (8/5) 0% (0/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 20% (2/8)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 53% (8/15) 15% (2/13)
Best of 5 Sets W% 67% (2/3) 100% (1/1)
TBs Win% (Total) 56% (5/9) 0% (0/2)
Deciding Set W% 33% (2/6) 50% (2/4)
1st set W, W 69% (13/9) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 15% (13/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 14% (7/1) 21% (14/3)

Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Cameron Norrie
62% ( 57 of 92)
1st Serve %
67% ( 59 of 88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77% ( 44 of 57)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 43 of 59)
49% ( 17 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
34% ( 31 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 32 of 88)
93
Total Points Won
87
W
7-6(4) 7-6(1) H2H
R3
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67% ( 62 of 93)
1st Serve %
62% ( 77 of 125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77% ( 48 of 62)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 53 of 77)
45% ( 14 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 26 of 48)
17% ( 2 of 12)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
33% ( 31 of 93)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 46 of 125)
108
Total Points Won
110
W
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nick Hardt
79% ( 54 of 68)
1st Serve %
82% ( 49 of 60)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70% ( 38 of 54)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 27 of 49)
36% ( 5 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
37% ( 25 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 28 of 60)
71
Total Points Won
57
W
7-5 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59% ( 27 of 46)
1st Serve %
65% ( 26 of 40)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
52% ( 14 of 27)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
79% ( 15 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
14% ( 2 of 14)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
37% ( 17 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
68% ( 27 of 40)
56
Total Points Won
30
L
6-1 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nicolas Jarry
77% ( 62 of 81)
1st Serve %
54% ( 37 of 68)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
65% ( 40 of 62)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 23 of 37)
68% ( 13 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 18 of 31)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
35% ( 28 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 68)
80
Total Points Won
69
W
6-4 7-5 H2H
SF
cross
Ben Shelton
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
69% ( 57 of 83)
1st Serve %
67% ( 65 of 97)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
84% ( 48 of 57)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 44 of 65)
62% ( 16 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
23% ( 19 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 34 of 97)
98
Total Points Won
82
L
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68% ( 17 of 25)
1st Serve %
63% ( 19 of 30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94% ( 16 of 17)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 12 of 19)
63% ( 5 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
73% ( 8 of 11)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
16% ( 4 of 25)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 10 of 30)
31
Total Points Won
24
W
6-3 0-1 ret. H2H
R2
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
65% ( 41 of 63)
1st Serve %
66% ( 39 of 59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 21 of 39)
41% ( 9 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
38% ( 24 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 26 of 59)
65
Total Points Won
57
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Andy Murray
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60% ( 41 of 68)
1st Serve %
68% ( 52 of 76)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83% ( 34 of 41)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 33 of 52)
67% ( 18 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 14 of 24)
25% ( 1 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 7)
24% ( 16 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 29 of 76)
81
Total Points Won
63
L
7-6(0) 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
56% ( 42 of 75)
1st Serve %
64% ( 48 of 75)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74% ( 31 of 42)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 35 of 48)
42% ( 14 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 10 of 27)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
40% ( 30 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 30 of 75)
75
Total Points Won
75
L
4-6 7-5 ret. H2H

Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76% ( 38 of 50)
1st Serve %
67% ( 33 of 49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79% ( 30 of 38)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 19 of 33)
33% ( 4 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 16 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 23 of 49)
57
Total Points Won
42
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66% ( 44 of 67)
1st Serve %
47% ( 35 of 75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80% ( 35 of 44)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 27 of 35)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 16 of 40)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
28% ( 19 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 32 of 75)
80
Total Points Won
62
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67% ( 44 of 66)
1st Serve %
46% ( 27 of 59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75% ( 33 of 44)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 18 of 27)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 12 of 32)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
35% ( 23 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 29 of 59)
72
Total Points Won
53
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56% ( 55 of 98)
1st Serve %
58% ( 44 of 76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67% ( 37 of 55)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 35 of 44)
56% ( 24 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
38% ( 37 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 22 of 76)
83
Total Points Won
91
W
3-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Federico Gaio
67% ( 64 of 95)
1st Serve %
66% ( 57 of 87)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
69% ( 44 of 64)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 35 of 57)
55% ( 17 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 15 of 30)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
36% ( 34 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 37 of 87)
98
Total Points Won
84
L
6-4 4-6 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Federico Gaio
50% ( 29 of 58)
1st Serve %
53% ( 21 of 40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79% ( 23 of 29)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 12 of 21)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
33% ( 19 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 20 of 40)
59
Total Points Won
39
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Federico Gaio
74% ( 50 of 68)
1st Serve %
55% ( 29 of 53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68% ( 34 of 50)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
63% ( 15 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
35% ( 24 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 22 of 53)
66
Total Points Won
55
L
7-6(5) 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Federico Gaio
Player
Karan Singh
43% ( 38 of 89)
1st Serve %
63% ( 60 of 95)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 44 of 60)
61% ( 31 of 51)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 13 of 35)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
34% ( 30 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 38 of 95)
97
Total Points Won
87
W
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Federico Gaio
81% ( 34 of 42)
1st Serve %
59% ( 30 of 51)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 19 of 30)
88% ( 7 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
14% ( 6 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 23 of 51)
59
Total Points Won
34
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Andre Ilagan
Player
Federico Gaio
77% ( 44 of 57)
1st Serve %
60% ( 38 of 63)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
70% ( 31 of 44)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 26 of 38)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
32% ( 18 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 27 of 63)
66
Total Points Won
54
L
6-2 7-5 H2H

Etcheverry Vs Gaio Prediction H2H Images To Share

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tomas Martin Etcheverry

Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona

Lajovic vs Etcheverry H2H Pick , could play in The Final

Tsitsipas vs Etcheverry H2H Pick , could play in The Final

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions