Tomas Papik vs Jonathan Binding Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papik vs Binding analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Papik vs Jonathan Binding Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papik has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Binding has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papik, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Binding has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papik has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Binding has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papik has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Binding winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 117/ 73), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Binding has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 52/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Papik winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Papik winning 2 and Binding winning 0. The last match between Papik and Binding was at the Egypt F8 (Sharm El Sheikh), 06-03-2017, Q3, Hard with Tomas Papik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Papik and Binding have played a deciding set 0 times, with Papik winning 0 times and Binding 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Papik winning 0, and Binding 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papik has played against opponents with an average rank of while Binding has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papik has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Binding has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papik has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Binding has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Papik 1 - 0 Binding
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Ret.
Rank
447
High
30
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (181-139)
Career Total W/L
53% (85-75)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Tomas Papik | Jonathan Binding |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tomas Papik | Jonathan Binding |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tomas Papik Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Tomas Papik
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-6(3) 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 1-3 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Tobias Simon
Player
Tomas Papik
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tomas Papik
Player
Jonas Trinker
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tomas Papik
Player
Hendrik Jebens
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
6
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Tomas Papik
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tomas Papik
Player
Jiri Jenicek
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jonathan Binding Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Jonathan Binding
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jonathan Binding
Player
Anvit Bendre
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dalwinder Singh
Player
Jonathan Binding
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
12
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H |
view more