Tomislav Edward Papac vs Mao Takada Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papac vs Takada analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomislav Edward Papac vs Mao Takada Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papac has won 49.39% of points on his second serve, while Takada has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papac, in recent form, has won 49.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Takada has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.7% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papac has saved 56.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Takada has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papac has won 50% of matches played (W/L 16/ 16), with Takada winning 7.69% (W/L 1/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papac has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 15/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 28/ 46). Takada has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 8/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Papac has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.61% of matches (W/L 16/ 15), where as Takada has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 7.69% of matches (W/L 1/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Papac winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Papac winning 2 and Takada winning 0. The last match between Papac and Takada was at the M25 Canberra, 20-03-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Tomislav Edward Papac getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Papac and Takada have played a deciding set 0 times, with Papac winning 0 times and Takada 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Papac winning 0, and Takada 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papac has played against opponents with an average rank of 95.41 while Takada has played against players with an average rank of 41.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papac has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Takada has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papac has converted 26.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Takada has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Papac 1 - 0 Takada
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
43% (104-136)
Career Total W/L
24% (11-34)
50% (5-5)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Tomislav Edward Papac | Mao Takada |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tomislav Edward Papac | Mao Takada |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (5/5) | 50% (1/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (10/12) | 40% (2/3) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (100/117) | 42% (20/28) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (1/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.23 | 0 |
Aces Total | 24 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
DFs Total | 26 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 148.7 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (248/409) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (173/248) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (72/161) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 29% (10/35) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 33% (127/385) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 50% (1/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Tomislav Edward Papac Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Luke Saville
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomislav Edward Papac
Player
Joshua Charlton
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve %
72%
(
13 of
18)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
15
Total Points Won
12
|
3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
73%
(
72 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
124)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
29 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomislav Edward Papac
Player
Sanhui Shin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tomislav Edward Papac
Player
Jay Fairclough
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 2-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Blake Mott
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Brandon Walkin
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Mao Takada Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Cooper Wilkinson
Player
Mao Takada
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patorn Hanchaikul
Player
Mao Takada
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chase Ferguson
Player
Mao Takada
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Justin Kuo
Player
Mao Takada
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Anthony Susanto
Player
Mao Takada
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more