Trevor Svajda vs Beibit Zhukayev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 05:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Svajda vs B. Zhukayev

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KAZ
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Svajda 1 - 0 Zhukayev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Trevor Svajda winning 2 and Beibit Zhukayev winning 0. The last match between Trevor Svajda and Beibit Zhukayev was at the Chicago Challenger, 06-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Trevor Svajda getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Svajda | 1 |
| Zhukayev | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Chicago Challenger(08-06-25)
T. Svajda vs B. Zhukayev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $347,285 |
| 63.64% (49-28) | Career Total W/L | 51.57% (197-185) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
T. Svajda vs B. Zhukayev Match Preview:
- How does Zhukayev perform with his second serve compared to Svajda? Zhukayev has recently achieved a 49.84% success rate on second serve points, while Svajda sits at 42.64%.
- In return game performance, Zhukayev has won 42.5% of opponents' second serve points, slightly behind Svajda's 45.55% success rate.
- Considering the first serve return stats, Svajda excels with a 31.2% success rate, clearly outperforming Zhukayev's 21.12%.
- Under pressure, Zhukayev has saved 58.7% of breakpoints, indicating an edge over Svajda, who saved 51.41% during the same period.
- Overall match performance last year shows Zhukayev with a 48.39% win rate, whereas Svajda leads with 69.7% victories.
- Which surface suits each player best? Zhukayev has a career-best win rate on Grass at 57%, while Svajda's top performance is on Hard courts with 68% wins.
- Examining the tournament level, Zhukayev played mostly at Challengers/ITF levels with limited success, winning 40%, while Svajda has been impressive at Futures/Satellites with an 83.33% win percentage.
- In terms of opponent quality, Zhukayev faced tougher competition with opponents' average ranking at 259.13 compared to Svajda's 347.82.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Svajda has a higher win percentage (56%) in final sets than Zhukayev (42%).
- Regarding break point conversion, Svajda has a better recent record, converting 33.13% of opportunities, whereas Zhukayev has managed 26.09%.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the recent performance trends and statistics of both players, Svajda appears to have significant advantages in several key areas.
Despite Zhukayev's stronger second serve points and higher breakpoint save percentage, Svajda's superior ability to convert break points, win deciding sets, and achieve a higher overall win percentage over the past year cannot be overlooked.
Svajda's prowess on hard courts and affirmative results in lower-tier tournaments suggest a consistent level of performance that could give him an edge in this matchup.
Based on these insights, Svajda is likely to emerge as the favorite to win the upcoming match against Zhukayev.
Trevor Svajda vs Beibit Zhukayev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Svajda vs B. Zhukayev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:3:17 | Average Match Time | 1:3:17 |
| 54% (21/39) | 1st Serve % | 50% (23/46) |
| 81% (17/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 67% (12/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (26/46) | Return Points Win % | 26% (10/39) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Svajda Recent Matches Played
B. Zhukayev Recent Matches Played

T. Svajda vs B. Zhukayev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.64% (49/28) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.57% (197/185) |
| 61.45% (102/64) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.35% (456/432) |
| 54.48% (839/701) | Games Win/Loss | 50.37% (4437/4372) |
| 67.65% (46/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.34% (114/92) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 39.74% (31/47) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.95% (40/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (12/9) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.75 |
| 190 | Aces Total | 3217 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 139 | Total Double Faults | 1388 |
| 1:27:54 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 371.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 400.45 |
| 58% (2689/4606) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14783/25144) |
| 68% (1820/2689) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (11205/14783) |
| 51% (986/1917) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5035/10361) |
| 45% (229/510) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (717/1814) |
| 43% (1923/4494) | Return Points Win % | 35% (8406/24195) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (2/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 45.83% (11/13) |
| 56.67% (17/13) | Challenger W/L | 47.70% (83/91) |
| 74.42% (32/11) | Futures W/L | 55.41% (87/70) |
| 62% (46/74) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (193/375) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 59% (10/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (94/181) |
| 50% (8/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (58/120) |
| 93% (45/42) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (200/165) |
| 7% (45/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (200/35) |
| 16% (31/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (182/31) |