Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Trey Hilderbrand vs Constantin Frantzen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hilderbrand vs Frantzen analysis and find out who is favored!
Trey Hilderbrand vs Constantin Frantzen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hilderbrand has won 49.9% of points on his second serve, while Frantzen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hilderbrand, in recent form, has won 48.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Frantzen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.32% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hilderbrand has saved 60.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frantzen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hilderbrand has won 60.42% of matches played (W/L 29/ 19), with Frantzen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hilderbrand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 44/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Frantzen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Hilderbrand has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.22% of matches (W/L 28/ 17), where as Frantzen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hilderbrand winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hilderbrand winning 1 and Frantzen winning 2. The last match between Hilderbrand and Frantzen was at the USA F34 (Waco), 24-11-2018, Q1 round, I.hard with Constantin Frantzen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hilderbrand and Frantzen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hilderbrand winning 0 times and Frantzen 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hilderbrand winning 0, and Frantzen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hilderbrand has played against opponents with an average rank of 111.19 while Frantzen has played against players with an average rank of 183.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hilderbrand has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frantzen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hilderbrand has converted 41.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frantzen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hilderbrand 0 - 1 Frantzen
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
60% (70-47)
Career Total W/L
53% (34-30)
65% (13-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hilderbrand VS Frantzen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Trey Hilderbrand | Constantin Frantzen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hilderbrand VS Frantzen H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 5-7 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Trey Hilderbrand | Constantin Frantzen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (28/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (239/207) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.61 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 133 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:3 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (735/1131) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (540/735) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (199/396) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (41/94) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (426/1170) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (13/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Trey Hilderbrand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Aristarkh Safonov
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | bye | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
11
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
57 of
78)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Daniel Khazime
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Bogdan Seleznev
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
16
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Pranav Kumar
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
22
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
1
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
51 of
63)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
21 of
83)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Andres Urrea
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Nick Hardt
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
13
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Constantin Frantzen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Constantin Frantzen
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roko Horvat
Player
Constantin Frantzen
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roy Smith
Player
Constantin Frantzen
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
13
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
43 of
54)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
14 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Omni Kumar
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
43%
(
41 of
96)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
106
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Constantin Frantzen
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Constantin Frantzen
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
15
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Taym Alazmeh
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Milan Welte
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Hilderbrand Vs Frantzen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
